To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Locking Compression Plate Fixation vs. Interlocking Nail Fixation for Humeral Shaft Fractures

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
January 2021

Locking Compression Plate Fixation vs. Interlocking Nail Fixation for Humeral Shaft Fractures

Vol: 10| Issue: 1| Number:26| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Locking compression plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: which one is better? A single-centre prospective randomized study.

Int Orthop. 2020 Oct;44(10):2113-2121.

Contributing Authors:
Y Akalin IG Şahin N Çevik BO Güler O Avci A Öztürk

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Sixty-three patients with displaced humerus shaft fractures less than 2 weeks old requiring surgery were randomized to undergo locking plate fixation (LCP; n=33) or interlocking nail (ILN; n=30) fixation. The outcomes of interest included function evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scores, the Short Form-3...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue