Locking compression plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: which one is better? A single-centre prospective randomized study.
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2021;9(2):19 Int Orthop. 2020 Oct;44(10):2113-2121.Riassunto dello studio
Sixty-three patients with displaced humerus shaft fractures less than 2 weeks old requiring surgery were randomized to undergo locking plate fixation (LCP; n=33) or interlocking nail (ILN; n=30) fixation. The outcomes of interest included function evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scores, the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS), and incidence of complications (i.e. iatrogenic radial injury, re-operation for nonunion, superficial infection, and deep infection). As well, time to fracture union, length of hospital stay, and time of operation were also recorded. Outcomes were measured at the time of first callus observation, and again at 24 months post-surgery. Sub-group analysis were conducted according to fracture type, specifically AO classification type A, and AO types B and C. Results demonstrated that VAS pain (p=0.017) and UCLA scores (p=0.034) for function were statistically significantly in favour of the LCP group vs ILN group at 24 months post-operation. Moreover, no cases of deep infection was observed in any of the groups and no statistical significant differences was recorded between the 2 groups with respect to incidence of complications (p>0.05). In the subgroup analysis of AO Type A fractures, DASH score was statistically significantly in favour of the LCP group at first callus observation (p=0.029), but this difference was not observed at 24-months follow-up. Moreover, when comparing LCP AO Type A fracture vs ILN Types B and C fracture, VAS pain was statistically significantly improved in favour of the LCP AO Type A at 24-months follow-up (p=0.037). Comparing LCP AO Types B and C fractures to ILN AO Type A fractures, ASES scores were statistically significantly improved at first callus observation (p=0.027) in the LCP AO Types B and C group; all other outcomes were not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups (p>0.05). The length of surgical time was statistically significantly longer in the LCP group (p=0.001). The LCP group had a statistically significantly shorter hospital stay compared to the ILN group (p=0.043).
Sblocca il Rapporto ACE completo
Ha accesso a 4 altri articoli GRATUITI questo mese.
Clicchi qui sotto per sbloccare e visualizzare questo ACE Reports
Sblocca ora
Valutazioni critiche dei più recenti studi randomizzati controllati ad alto impatto e revisioni sistematiche in ortopedia.
Accesso ai contenuti del podcast OrthoEvidence, comprese le collaborazioni con il Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, le interviste con chirurghi di fama internazionale e le tavole rotonde sulle novità e gli argomenti ortopedici
Abbonamento a The Pulse, una newsletter bisettimanale basata sulle evidenze scientifiche, progettata per aiutarla a prendere decisioni cliniche migliori.
Accesso esclusivo ad articoli di contenuto originale, tra cui revisioni sistematiche interne, e articoli sui metodi di ricerca sanitaria e su argomenti ortopedici scottanti.
Oppure faccia l'upgrade oggi stesso e acceda a tutti i contenuti di OrthoEvidence a soli 1,99$ a settimana.
Ha già un account? Effettui il login
È affiliato ad una delle nostre associazioni partner?
Clicchi qui per ottenere l'accesso gratuito tra i vantaggi dei membri della sua associazione!
Si abboni a "L'Impulso"
Ortopedia basata sull'evidenza direttamente nella sua casella di posta elettronica. ABBONARSI