To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Subjective hip function similar, better mobility with hemiarthroplasty vs. screw fixation for FN Frx

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
February 2019

Subjective hip function similar, better mobility with hemiarthroplasty vs. screw fixation for FN Frx

Vol: 8| Issue: 2| Number:16| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Screw Fixation Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jan 16;101(2):136-144. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00316

Contributing Authors:
F Frihagen O Talsnes SE Hoelsbrekken V Opland FC Dolatowski S Bartels J Saltyte Benth SE Utvag

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

219 patients with a nondisplaced femoral neck fracture were randomized to treatment with either hemiarthroplasty or screw fixation with two cancellous screws. Patients were followed up at 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Primary outcome was the Harris Hip Score, while secondary outcomes included mobility, pain, quality of life, and rate of reoperation. For the primary outcome, there was no si...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue