To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Similar mid- to long-term clinical scores between hip resurfacing and large-head MoM THA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
November 2018

Similar mid- to long-term clinical scores between hip resurfacing and large-head MoM THA

Vol: 7| Issue: 11| Number:6| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients-a minimum of five year follow-up

Int Orthop. 2018 Oct;42(10):2323-2327. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3819-9

Contributing Authors:
Y Lu Y Cao F Liu HT Xu W Wang R Tao YK Liu ZY Zhou

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

68 patients with hip pathology which required operative management were randomized to either hip resurfacing arthroplasty or large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Patients were assessed for postoperative outcome related to hip function and the incidence of complications at a minimum of 5 years after surgery. Mean final follow-up was over 7 years in both groups. Results related to Harri...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue