To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

SICOT2018: CT assessment of component rotation in TKA between CCB and conventional instruments

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2018

SICOT2018: CT assessment of component rotation in TKA between CCB and conventional instruments

Vol: 7| Issue: 10| Number:78| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

COMPARISON OF COMPONENT ROTATIONAL POSITION BETWEEN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY PERFORMED WITH CUSTOMISED CUTTING BLOCK VERSUS CONVENTIONAL CUTTING INSTRUMENT USING COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Contributing Authors:
S Kanitnate N Tammachote N Chanalithichai C Jitapunkul

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS

This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.

Synopsis

86 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to surgery completed with either the use of custom cutting blocks or standard instruments. The purpose of this study was to compare femoral component rotation and tibial component rotation between the two groups. Mean deviation in femoral component rotational alignment, and the incidence of outliers in femoral rotational alignment, ...

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.