LOGIN
SICOT2018: Comparison of surgical, clinical, & complication outcomes of MIS vs. conventional DHS
October 2018
SICOT2018: Comparison of surgical, clinical, & complication outcomes of MIS vs. conventional DHS
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
COMPARISON OF THE OUTCOME BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL OPEN TECHNIQUE AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNIQUE USING DYNAMIC HIP SCREW FOR FIXATION OF INTER-TROCHANTERIC FRACTURE OF FEMUR
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
60 patients scheduled for fixation of an intertrochanteric fracture with a dynamic hip screw were randomized to either minimally invasive or conventional fixation. Patients were assessed for outcome over the first 52 weeks after surgery. Groups were reported to not significantly differ with respect to length of hospital stay, time to union, functional outcome on the modified Harris Hip Score, and ...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.