Web-based Self-Help Intervention Reduces Incidence of Depression in Persistent Back Pain Patients .
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
This study has been identified as potentially high impact.
OE's AI-driven High Impact metric estimates the influence a paper is likely to have by integrating signals from both the journal in which it is published and the scientific content of the article itself.
Developed using state-of-the-art natural language processing, the OE High Impact model more accurately predicts a study's future citation performance than journal impact factor alone.
This enables earlier recognition of clinically meaningful research and helps readers focus on articles most likely to shape future practice.
Effectiveness of a Guided Web-Based Self-help Intervention to Prevent Depression in Patients With Persistent Back Pain: The PROD-BP Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 1;77(10):1001-1011.Exclusive Author Interview
Two hundred and ninety-five patients with persistent back pain and subclinical depression were randomized to receive standard treatment for back pain plus a web-based self-help intervention for depression (eSano BackCare-DP) or standard back pain treatment alone for the prevention of major depressive episodes (MDEs). The primary outcome of interest was the onset of a MDE within the 12 month follow-up period. Secondary outcomes of interest included clinician-rated depression severity (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Quick Inventory Depressive Symptomology (QIDS), and self-rated depression severity (PHQ-9). Additional outcomes included pain on a numeric rating scale (NRS), quality of life (Assessment of Quality of life [AQoL-6D]), pain related disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), pain self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire [PSEQ]), work capacity (Subjective Prognostic Employment Scale [SPE]), and user satisfaction (Client Satisfaction with Online Interventions Questionnaire 8). Outcomes were assessed up to 12 months post-treatment. Results demonstrated that a statistically significantly lower incidence of depression onset was observed in the intervention group compared to the control group (p<0.001) at 12 months follow-up. Depression severity as measured by HAM-D, QIDS, PHQ-9 were all significantly in favour of the intervention group up to 12 months post-treatment. Moreover, ODI scores, PSEQ scores, and AQoL-6D scores were significantly in favour of the intervention group up to 12 months post-treatment. No significant differences in NRS pain scores and SPE scores, or the incidence of adverse events were observed between the two groups up to 12 months post-treatment.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
