Vascular Impulse Technology vs. Elevation for Swelling in Extremity Joint Fracture Surgery .
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Vascular impulse technology versus elevation for reducing the swelling of upper and lower extremity joint fractures.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 12;13(1):661.Sixty-eight patients with a complex extremity joint fracture were randomized to receive intermittent pneumatic compression using a vascular impulse technology (VIT) device before and after surgery (n=35) or elevation (n=31). The primary outcome of interest was the time from hospital admission to operability. Secondary outcomes of interest included length of stay, decongestion (%/day), the proportion of pain-free patients, complications, and revision. VIT therapy did not provide any significant improvement in overall time to operability (p=0.12), however it significantly reduced the time to operability in lower extremity fracture patients (p=0.009). No differences in length of stay were observed. Decongestion rate trended in favour of the VIT group (p=0.05), and the proportion of pain-free patients before and after surgery was significantly higher in the VIT group (p=0.044; p<0.001, respectively).
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
