Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Wound Infiltration in Instrumented Spinal Surgeries .
Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia in instrumented lumbar spinal surgeries.
BMC Anesthesiol . 2024 Oct 15;24(1):374.Eighty patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgeries with instrumentation were randomized to receive either ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) (n=40) or wound infiltration (WI) (n=40). The primary outcome of interest was postoperative pain intensity, assessed via the visual analog scale (VAS) at multiple time points. Secondary outcomes included total opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and patient satisfaction. Outcomes were assessed up to 24 hours postoperatively. Overall, the results revealed no significant differences in VAS scores between the groups, but ESPB resulted in a longer time to first rescue analgesia (p=0.045) and lower total opioid consumption (p=0.010). These findings suggest that ESPB is a superior option for postoperative analgesia due to its opioid-sparing effects and prolonged analgesic duration.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics