ACE Report Cover
Treating closed mallet finger with Quickcast reduces edema & improves DIP joint extension
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Sprache
Download Download Download
Herunterladen
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Zitieren
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favoriten
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Sprache
Download Download Download
Herunterladen
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Zitieren
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favoriten
HAND & WRIST
Treating closed mallet finger with Quickcast reduces edema & improves DIP joint extension .
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2013;1(16):14 J Hand Ther. 2013 Jul-Sep;26(3):191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Feb 27

60 patients with distal interphalangeal joint (DIPj) active extensor lag were randomized to determine the efficacy between cast immobilization treatment using either a Quickcast orthosis to be worn 24 hours a day or a removable, low temperature thermoplastic, lever-type orthosis. After 24-28 weeks, there were no significant differences between the two groups in regard to success rate, orthosis discomfort, satisfaction with orthotic design, DIPj flexion stiffness, incidence of complications, and grip and tip-to-tip pinch strengths. However, the Quickcast group experienced significantly greater active extension at the distal interphalangeal joint at 10-12 weeks and significantly less edema at 6-8 weeks compared to the low temperature thermoplastic, lever-type orthosis group.


Details zur Finanzierung der Veröffentlichung +
Finanzierung:
Non-funded
Interessenkonflikte:
None disclosed

Risiko der Voreingenommenheit

8/10

Kriterien für die Berichterstattung

18/20

Fragilitäts-Index

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

Ja = 1

Ungewiss = 0.5

Nicht relevant = 0

Nein = 0

Die Bewertung der Berichtskriterien bewertet die Transparenz, mit der die Autoren die methodischen und studienspezifischen Merkmale der Studie in der Veröffentlichung angeben. Die Bewertung ist in fünf Kategorien unterteilt, die im Folgenden vorgestellt werden.

4/4

Randomization

3/4

Outcome Measurements

4/4

Inclusion / Exclusion

4/4

Therapy Description

3/4

Statistics

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

Der Fragilitätsindex ist ein Instrument, das bei der Interpretation signifikanter Ergebnisse hilft und ein Maß für die Stärke eines Ergebnisses liefert. Der Fragilitätsindex gibt die Anzahl der aufeinanderfolgenden Ereignisse an, die zu einem dichotomen Ergebnis hinzugefügt werden müssen, damit das Ergebnis nicht mehr signifikant ist. Eine kleine Zahl steht für ein schwächeres Ergebnis und eine große Zahl für ein stärkeres Ergebnis.

Warum wurde diese Studie jetzt benötigt?

Mallet finger occurs when the extensor terminal tendon in the long fingers is either lacerated or ruptured. Although this injury can be treated surgically, conservative methods where the distal interphalangeal joint (DIPj) is immobilized are usually preferred. However, it is unclear what type of immobilization device is the most appropriate in handling this injury. Therefore this study aimed to compare efficacy of treating closed mallet fingers using a cast worn 24 hours a day versus a removable, lever-type thermoplastic orthosis.

Was war die wichtigste Forschungsfrage?

Is cast immobilization of Type I mallet finger injuries more effective with Quickcast or a self-removable, thermoplastic, lever-type orthosis, measured over 24-28 weeks?

Merkmale der Studie +
Bevölkerung:
60 patients with at least 20 degree distal interphalangeal joint active extensor lag for less than 90 days who lived within 75 km of the Hand Center (Age range: >18) (n=57 patients completed follow-up)
Intervention:
LTTP Group: After entering the emergency room, patients were given a removable, custom-fabricated low temperature thermoplastic (LTTP), lever-type orthosis that covered the distal phalanx circumferentially and stretched downward towards the middle phalanx. The bottom of the orthosis was held in place with 1/2 inch paper adhesive tape. For the first 6-8 weeks patients were advised to remove the orthosis once a day to allow for skin care. Afterwards patients were instructed to remove their orthosis 6-8 times a day to perform metacarpal phalangeal flexion blocking exercises. At 7-9 weeks, patients began performing active fisting exercises. At 8-10 weeks, patients were told to only wear the orthosis at night. After 10-12 weeks, they were told to discontinue wearing the orthosis at all (Mean age: 47.1 +/- 14.5) (n=30)
Vergleich:
QC Group: After entering the emergency room, patients were given a custom-fabricated Quickcast (QC) orthosis to wear for 6-8 weeks that they were advised not to remove during that period. The orthosis covered the distal and middle phalanges circumferentially with the bottom of the orthosis held in place with adhesive tape. At 6-8 weeks patients were given the same LTTP orthosis as the LTTP group. Afterwards patients followed the same protocol as described for the LTTP group for weeks 6-28 (Mean age: 42.7 +/- 12.9) (n=30; 27 completed follow-up)
Ergebnisse:
The primary outcome measures were distal interphalangeal joint (DIPj) extensor lag, dichotomous success rating, and range of motion (ROM) (measured dorsally using a flat Baseline 15 cm metal arm goniometer). Secondary outcome measures included presence of finger edema (measured using 15 different Oval-8 Ring Sizers which were fitted around the finger until the smallest acceptable sizer could not go past the midway section of the middle phalanx, DIPj, and distal phalanx of the finger), orthosis discomfort, subjective aesthetic assessment of orthosis, satisfaction with final outcome (all three measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS)), DIPj flexion stiffness, grip and tip-to-tip pinch strength (measured using a E-Link Dynamometer System), and the incidence of complications
Methoden:
RCT: single-center; single-blinded (outcome assessor)
Zeit:
Outcomes were measured at baseline and at 3-4, 6-8, 7-9, 8-10, 10-12, 12-14, and at 24-28 weeks
Was waren die wichtigsten Ergebnisse?
  • At the 10-12 week evaluation, the QC group had a mean of 5° more active extension at the DIPj compared to the LTTP group (p=0.05). It was also determined that there was a correlation between edema and active extension, where the lower the edema, the more active extension at the DIPj (p=0.003).
  • There was no significant difference in the orthosis success rate between the LTTP group (60%) and the QC group (81%) (Chi-squared: 3.31; Degrees of freedom: 1; p=0.08).
  • ¬-At the 6-8 week assessment, significantly less edema was experienced in the QC group (0.4 +/- 0.9), compared to the LTTP group (1.1 +/- 0.8) (p=0.03). At all other time points there was no significant difference between groups.
  • At the 3-4 week assessment there was no significant difference in median VAS pain scores between the LTTP group (0.2 cm) and the QC group (0.6 cm) (Wilcoxon Rank Sum (WRS) test: p=0.14). However, at the 6-8 week assessment median pain scores were significantly lower in the LTTP group (0 cm), compared to the QC group (0.4 cm) (WRS test: p=0.03).
  • At the final 24-28 week evaluation there were no significant differences in mean VAS outcome satisfaction scores based on the orthotic design between the LTTP group (1.8 cm) and the QC group (1.0 cm) (p=0.23).
  • There were no significant differences between the two groups in regard to active DIPj flexion stiffness, grip, and tip-to-tip pinch strength at any time point throughout the 28 weeks. At the final 24-28 week assessment nearly full recovery of both grip strength and pinch strength comparative to the uninjured finger were achieved for both the QC group (Grip strength: 96%; Pinch strength: 90.8%) and the LTTP group (Grip strength: 98.2%; Pinch strength: 93.4%).
  • None of patients reported any cases of severe skin complications, such as ulcerations or necrosis.
Was sollte ich mir besonders merken?

Following 24-28 weeks, the results of this study indicated that there were similarities between the Quickcast and custom-fabricated low temperature thermoplastic, lever-type orthosis groups regarding success rate, orthosis discomfort, satisfaction with orthotic design, distal interphalangeal joint flexion stiffness, incidence of complications, and grip and tip-to-tip pinch strengths. However, the Quickcast group experienced significantly greater active extension at the distal interphalangeal joint and less edema.

Wie wird sich dies auf die Behandlung meiner Patienten auswirken?

Both the Quickcast and custom-fabricated low temperature thermoplastic, lever-type orthosis provide effective treatment of distal interphalangeal joint active extensor lag following injury. However, Quickcast may be a more suitable immobilization device as in this study less edema and more active extension at the distal interphalangeal joint were associated with this orthosis. In order to improve success rates further research is required to determine what the optimal immobilization period and orthosis discontinuation process are following a mallet finger injury.

HAFTUNGSAUSSCHLUSS

Der Inhalt dieser Seite dient nur zu Informationszwecken und ist nicht als Ersatz für professionelle medizinische Beratung, Diagnose oder Behandlung gedacht. Wenn Sie eine medizinische Behandlung benötigen, wenden Sie sich immer an Ihren Arzt oder suchen Sie die nächstgelegene Notaufnahme auf. Die Meinungen, Überzeugungen und Standpunkte, die von den Personen auf dieser Seite geäußert werden, spiegeln nicht die Meinungen, Überzeugungen und Standpunkte von OrthoEvidence wider.

0 von 4 monatliche KOSTENLOSE Artikel freigeschaltet
Sie haben Ihr Limit von 4 kostenlosen Artikeln in diesem Monat erreicht

Zugang zu OrthoEvidence für nur $1,99 pro Woche.

Bleiben Sie auf dem Laufenden mit den neuesten Beweisen. Jederzeit kündbar.
  • Kritische Beurteilungen der neuesten, hochwirksamen randomisierten kontrollierten Studien und systematischen Übersichten in der Orthopädie
  • Zugang zu OrthoEvidence-Podcast-Inhalten, einschließlich Kooperationen mit dem Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Interviews mit international anerkannten Chirurgen und Diskussionsrunden zu orthopädischen Neuigkeiten und Themen
  • Abonnement von The Pulse, einem zweimal wöchentlich erscheinenden evidenzbasierten Newsletter, der Ihnen helfen soll, bessere klinische Entscheidungen zu treffen
Upgrade
Close Dialog
Willkommen zurück!
Passwort vergessen?
Starten Sie Ihre KOSTENLOSE Testversion noch heute!

Ihr Konto ist verbunden mit
und umfasst den kostenlosen Zugang zu OrthoEvidence


ODER
Passwort vergessen?

ODER
Bitte überprüfen Sie Ihre E-Mail

Wenn ein Konto mit der angegebenen E-Mail-Adresse existiert, wird Ihnen eine E-Mail zum Zurücksetzen des Passworts zugesandt. Wenn Sie keine E-Mail sehen, überprüfen Sie bitte Ihren Spam- oder Junk-Ordner.

Für weitere Hilfe, kontaktieren Sie unser Support-Team.

Bitte melden Sie sich an, um diese Funktion zu aktivieren

Um auf diese Funktion zugreifen zu können, müssen Sie bei einem aktiven OrthoEvidence-Konto angemeldet sein. Bitte melden Sie sich an oder erstellen Sie ein KOSTENLOSES Testkonto.

Übersetzen ACE Report

OrthoEvidence nutzt einen externen Übersetzungsdienst, um Inhalte in mehreren Sprachen zugänglich zu machen. Bitte beachten Sie, dass trotz aller Bemühungen um Genauigkeit die Übersetzungen nicht immer perfekt sind.

Wie man dies zitiert ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Treating closed mallet finger with Quickcast reduces edema & improves DIP joint extension. OE Journal. 2013;1(16):14. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/treating-closed-mallet-finger-with-quickcast-reduces-edema-improves-dip-joint-extension

Zitat kopieren
Bitte melden Sie sich an, um diese Funktion zu aktivieren

Um auf diese Funktion zugreifen zu können, müssen Sie bei einem aktiven OrthoEvidence-Konto angemeldet sein. Bitte melden Sie sich an oder erstellen Sie ein KOSTENLOSES Testkonto.

Premium-Mitglied-Funktion

Um auf diese Funktion zugreifen zu können, müssen Sie bei einem Premium-Konto von OrthoEvidence angemeldet sein.

Teilen Sie dies ACE Report