ARTHROPLASTY
Faster recovery without the use of a tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2014;2(20):4 Acta Orthop. 2014 Aug;85(4):422-6. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.931197. Epub 2014 Jun 23.70 patients with stage 3-5 gonarthrosis were randomized to undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with or without the application of a tourniquet. The purpose of this trial was to determine whether TKA should be performed with or without the use of a tourniquet, based on functional and clinical outcomes at one year postoperatively. Results revealed that TKA without the use of a tourniquet significantly improved KOOS functional outcomes and knee range of motion up to 8 weeks after surgery, but resulted in greater intraoperative bleeding compared to TKA using a tourniquet. However, neither group required transfusion following TKA.
Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?
Was allocation adequately concealed?
Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?
Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?
Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?
Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?
Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?
はい = 1
不確実＝0.5
無関係 = 0
いいえ = 0
報告基準評価では、著者が出版物内で試験の方法論的特徴や試験特性を報告する際の透明性を評価します。評価は以下の5つのカテゴリーに分類されます。
4/4
Randomization
2/4
Outcome Measurements
4/4
Inclusion / Exclusion
4/4
Therapy Description
4/4
Statistics
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
Fragility Indexは、重要な所見の解釈を助けるツールで、結果の強さの尺度を提供します。Fragility Indexは、その所見が有意でなくなるために、二項対立の結果に追加する必要がある連続した事象の数を表します。数値が小さいほど弱い所見を表し、数値が大きいほど強い所見を表します。
なぜ今この研究が必要なのですか？
Tourniquets are frequently used to reduce intraoperative bleeding during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While they may offer the potential to improve blood loss, visual field, surgical time, and quality of cementation, they are also associated with postoperative disadvantages including heightened pain, reduced muscle strength, and limited knee range of motion. Thus, this study was needed to investigate whether the advantages of tourniquet use during TKA outweigh the potential for adverse effects. The authors hypothesized non-tourniquet patients would achieve improved functional outcomes, increased knee range of motion, reduced postoperative pain, and lowered analgesic consumption.
主な研究課題は何ですか？
How does total knee arthroplasty with and without the use of a tourniquet compare with respect to functional and clinical outcomes over the first postoperative year?
重要な知見は？
- The tourniquet and non-tourniquet groups both improved in all KOOS sub-scales (pain, symptoms, function in daily living, function in sport/rec, knee related quality of life) from baseline to 8 weeks, with significant improvement in the non-tourniquet group compared to the tourniquet group at day 2 postoperative (p<0.05).
- Knee range of motion was significantly superior in the non-tourniquet group compared to the tourniquet group day 2 postoperative (48 (SD 9.5, 95% CI: 44-51) degrees vs. 36 (SD 7.9, 95% CI: 33-39) degrees; p < 0.001) and 8 weeks after surgery (100 (SD 7.2, 95% CI: 97-102) degrees vs. 93 (SD 8.2, 95% CI: 90-6) degrees; p = 0.002). This difference was no longer detectable at the 6 or 12 month follow-up (both p>0.05).
- In the non-tourniquet group: mean VAS pain was significantly lower day 2 postoperative (4.6 (SD 1.4, 95% CI: 4.1-5.1) vs. 5.5 (SD 1.6, 95% CI: 5-6.1); p<0.02), analgesic consumption was lower, intraoperative bleeding was greater (280 (SD 52) mL vs. 140 (SD 32.7) mL) and surgical time/visibility was similar compared to the tourniquet group.
- No patients required transfusions.1 patient in the non-tourniquet group and 2 patients in the tourniquet group experienced deep vein thrombosis.
最も覚えておくべきことは？
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without the use of a tourniquet improved KOOS functional outcomes and knee range of motion up to 8 weeks after surgery, but resulted in greater intraoperative bleeding compared to tourniquet use. However, no patient in either group required transfusion.
それが私の患者ケアにどのように影響するか？
Other than increased intraoperative bleeding, which did not lead to an increased need for transfusion, the absence of a tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty does not appear to result in any additional complications. In fact, the aforementioned findings found the absence of a tourniquet resulted in superior functional outcome, improved knee range of motion, as well as reduced pain and analgesia consumption compared to TKA with a tourniquet. Additional trials are required to confirm these results.
免責事項
このページに記載されている内容は、情報提供のみを目的としたものであり、専門的な医療アドバイス、診断、治療の代わりとなるものではありません。治療が必要な場合は、必ず医師の診断を仰ぐか、最寄りの救急外来を受診してください。このページに記載されている内容に関して個人が表明した意見、信念、見解は、OrthoEvidenceの意見、信念、見解を反映するものではありません。
0の4 月間無料記事のロック解除
