Tibial fractures: Alpha-BSM comparable to autogenous bone graft in preventing subsidence .
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2013;1(3):115 J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Oct;90(10):2057-61119 patients presenting with acute, closed, unstable tibial plateau fractures (120 fractures) were randomized to undergo standard open reduction and internal fixation with either a bioresorbable calcium phosphate cement (alpha-BSM) or an autogenous iliac bone graft. The results after a 12 month follow-up indicated that the use of alpha-BSM was superior in reducing articular subsidence compared to autogenous iliac bone graft.
Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?
Was allocation adequately concealed?
Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?
Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?
Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?
Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?
Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?
Oui = 1
Incertain = 0,5
Non pertinent = 0
Non = 0
L'évaluation des critères de rapport permet d'évaluer la transparence avec laquelle les auteurs rapportent les caractéristiques méthodologiques et les caractéristiques de l'essai dans la publication. L'évaluation est divisée en cinq catégories qui sont présentées ci-dessous.
3/4
Randomization
4/4
Outcome Measurements
2/4
Inclusion / Exclusion
3/4
Therapy Description
2/4
Statistics
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
L'indice de fragilité est un outil qui aide à l'interprétation des résultats significatifs, en fournissant une mesure de la force d'un résultat. L'indice de fragilité représente le nombre d'événements consécutifs qui doivent être ajoutés à un résultat dichotomique pour que le résultat ne soit plus significatif. Un petit nombre représente un résultat plus faible et un grand nombre un résultat plus fort.
Pourquoi cette étude était-elle nécessaire maintenant ?
For patients with defects resulting from unstable tibial plateau fractures, use of the autogenous iliac bone graft is considered the standard choice of treatment. However, there are reported disadvantages and complications associated with this procedure. Prevention of articular surface collapse is the primary goal of autogenous grafting to treat subarticular defects; however, the use of artificial material with internal fixation may provide the necessary benefits and support for the articular surface. Few in vivo studies have demonstrated the benefits of a calcium phosphate cement (alpha-BSM) over bone grafts indicating the need for more trials evaluating the effectiveness of the alpha-BSM.
Quelle était la principale question de recherche ?
Is the use of a calcium phosphate cement (alpha-BSM) as effective as autogenous iliac bone graft in the treatment of subarticular bone defects resulting from tibial plateau fractures, measured over a 12 month time period?
- There was no significant difference regarding the age, height, weight, sex and fracture patterns of the patients between the two groups.
- There was no difference between the two treatment groups with respect to union or the frequency of union, and infections.
- There was no dissolution in either the bone graft of the alpha-BSM prior to fracture union, evidenced by the absence of radiolucent zones on radiographs. No patients in either of the treatment groups had loss of internal fixation.
- During the 3-12 month follow up period, the autogenous bone graft group had a significantly higher rate of articular subsidence compared to the alpha-BSM group (subsidence of 2mm or greater in 30% of autogenous graft patients vs. 9% of alpha-BSM patients) (p=0.009).
- The alpha-BSM group demonstrated a greater improvement in range of motion compared to the autogenous graft group (not significant difference).
De quoi dois-je me souvenir en priorité ?
This study demonstrated that alpha-BSM, for the intervention of tibial plateau fractures, resulted in similar and possibly better mechanical support when compared to autogenous bone grafts, as less subsidence was observed in patients treated with alpha-BSM.
Comment cela affectera-t-il les soins prodigués à mes patients ?
Patients with unstable tibial plateau fractures may receive comparable outcomes when treated with alpha-BSM compared to autogenous iliac bone graft. As this is one of the first studies investigating alpha-BSM in comparison to autogenous iliac bone graft, further trials are need to establish alpha-BSM as an adequate augmentation to open reduction and internal fixation of unstable tibial plateau fractures.
AVIS DE NON-RESPONSABILITÉ
Le contenu de cette page est fourni à titre d'information uniquement et n'est pas destiné à remplacer un avis médical, un diagnostic ou un traitement professionnel. Si vous avez besoin d'un traitement médical, demandez toujours l'avis de votre médecin ou rendez-vous au service des urgences le plus proche. Les opinions, croyances et points de vue exprimés par les individus sur le contenu de cette page ne reflètent pas les opinions, croyances et points de vue d'OrthoEvidence.
0 de 4 articles mensuels GRATUITS débloqués
