ACE Report Cover
Thrust vs. non-thrust therapy for PPT in chronic neck pain patients
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
SPINE
Thrust vs. non-thrust therapy for PPT in chronic neck pain patients .
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.

Immediate Changes in Neck Pain Intensity and Widespread Pressure Pain Sensitivity in Patients With Bilateral Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Thoracic Thrust Manipulation vs Non-Thrust Mobilization

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Jun;37(5):312-9

Fifty two patients suffering from bilateral chronic mechanical neck pain were randomized to receive either spine thrust manipulation or non-thrust mobilization to determine the efficacy of the former. Patients were monitored over 10 minutes after intervention and were assessed based on pressure pain sensitivity and intensity. The results of this study demonstrated similar improvements in pain pressure threshold (PPT) in bot the thrust manipulation and non-thrust mobilization groups. Within-group and between-group effect sizes were small. Thrust patients experienced a greater decrease in neck pain; within-group effect sizes were large for both groups, and between-group effect sizes were large in favor of thrust.

Unlock the Full ACE Report

You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence
content for as little as $1.99 per week.
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

Cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Thrust vs. non-thrust therapy for PPT in chronic neck pain patients. ACE Report. 2015;4(6):18. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/thrust-vs-non-thrust-therapy-for-ppt-in-chronic-neck-pain-patients

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report