ACE Report Cover
Thermal vs. non-thermal rehabilitation for knee OA
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
OSTEOARTHRITIS
Thermal vs. non-thermal rehabilitation for knee OA .

Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of thermal cure and rehabilitation in knee osteoarthritis. A randomized therapeutic trial

Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014 Dec;57(9-10):561-9.

Two hundred and thirty three patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) were randomized to either thermal or non-thermal rehabilitation, so that the clinical effects of the two treatments could be compared. The primary outcome of interest was VAS pain score at 12 months. On day 21, the final treatment day, there was no significant difference between groups in VAS scores for pain or Lequesne index for function. At 6 months, however, the non-thermal rehabilitation group demonstrated significantly lower VAS pain score, WOMAC pain score, and Lequense index score compared to the thermal group. By 12 month follow-up, the thermal group demonstrated favourable pain outcome through both VAS pain and WOMAC pain compared to the non-thermal group. Functional outcome on the Lequesne Index was not significantly different between groups at 12 months.

Unlock the Full ACE Report

You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence
content for as little as $1.99 per week.
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

Cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Thermal vs. non-thermal rehabilitation for knee OA. ACE Report. 2015;4(2):37. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/thermal-vs-non-thermal-rehabilitation-for-knee-oa

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report