Superficial Versus Deep Local Anesthetic Infiltration in Carpal Tunnel Release
Superficial Versus Deep Local Anesthetic Infiltration in Carpal Tunnel Release: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2025 May 21;7(4):100721.Seventy-four participants (eighty procedures) with carpal tunnel syndrome were randomized to deep LA infiltration (n=38) or superficial LA infiltration (n=42). The primary outcome was presence and severity of pain (and tingling) during LA infiltration and during the procedure, assessed immediately post-Carpal tunnel release (CTR). Secondary outcomes included VAS pain at 2, 8, and 24 hours, and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) at baseline and 3 months. Overall, the results of the study revealed no statistically significant differences between deep and superficial techniques for pain during infiltration or during the procedure, nor for early postoperative pain; both groups had marked and similar improvements in BCTQ at 3 months. These findings suggest superficial infiltration—being technically simpler and avoiding theoretical median-nerve risk—is a reasonable default for CTR under wide awake local anesthetic no tourniquet (WALANT).
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics