ACE Report Cover
Single vs Dual Drains in BE-ULBD for Lumbar Stenosis
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
SPINE
Single vs Dual Drains in BE-ULBD for Lumbar Stenosis .

Does the number of drain tubes influence the formation of postoperative spinal epidural hematoma following biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (BE-ULBD) in patients with two-level adjacent lumbar spinal stenosis? a prospe

J Orthop Surg Res . 2025 Jun 24;20(1):615.

Eighty-nine patients with two-level adjacent lumbar spinal stenosis were randomized to receive one drain tube (n=43) or two drain tubes (n=46) after BE-ULBD. The primary outcome was the cross-sectional area (CSA) of POSEH on MRI at 72 hours. Secondary outcomes included postoperative leg-pain VAS, total drainage volume, and length of stay. Outcomes were assessed up to 72 hours for MRI (and clinically thereafter for complications). Overall, the results showed no between-group differences in cranial CSA or caudal CSA, but total drain output was higher with two tubes, with no differences in 72-h VAS or hospital stay. Two cases of symptomatic POSEH occurred—one per group—managed successfully with percutaneous drainage. These findings suggest that adding a second drain increases output but does not meaningfully reduce POSEH formation following BE-ULBD.

Unlock the Full ACE Report

You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence
content for as little as $1.99 per week.
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

Cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Single vs Dual Drains in BE-ULBD for Lumbar Stenosis. ACE Report. 2025;307(9):1. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/single-vs-dual-drains-in-be-ulbd-for-lumbar-stenosis

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report