Similar outcomes for lateral vs posterior approach for hemiarthroplasty in hip fracture .
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Lateral versus posterior approach for insertion of hemiarthroplasties for hip fractures: A randomised trial of 216 patients
Injury. 2015 Jun;46(6):1023-7216 patients with an intracapsular hip fracture were randomized to either a lateral or posterior approach for the insertion of a cemented hemiarthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal approach for hemiarthroplasty in hip fracture surgery. Findings showed comparable outcomes in terms of mortality, degree of residual pain and recovered walking ability between the two surgical approaches.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
