Similar migration and lower radiolucency with cementless vs cemented UKA
Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using radiostereometric analysis: A randomised controlled trial
Bone Joint J. 2015 Feb;97-B(2):185-91Forty-seven patients scheduled for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with an Oxford implant were randomized to either cemented or cementless fixation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether fixation types differed with respect to radiostereometric migration. Follow-up was performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The only consistent difference that was noted between groups was y-axis translation, with significant greater subsidence found in cementless components, mostly occurring within the first 3 months after surgery. A higher incidence in radiolucency around the tibial component was found in the cemented group compared to the cementless group.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
