Similar functional outcomes in surgical & conservative treatment of rotator cuff tear .
This study has been identified as potentially high impact.
OE's AI-driven High Impact metric estimates the influence a paper is likely to have by integrating signals from both the journal in which it is published and the scientific content of the article itself.
Developed using state-of-the-art natural language processing, the OE High Impact model more accurately predicts a study's future citation performance than journal impact factor alone.
This enables earlier recognition of clinically meaningful research and helps readers focus on articles most likely to shape future practice.
Comparing surgical repair with conservative treatment for degenerative rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Aug;24(8):1274-8156 patients with a degenerative, full-thickness rotator cuff tear were randomly assigned to receive either conservative treatment or mini-open repair in order to compare outcomes between treatment methods. Follow-up was performed for 12 months post-intervention. No significant differences were observed between overall groups in any outcome measure. In a subgroup analysis of the few patients with an intact rotator cuff (successful surgical repair/no re-tear), significantly better Constant-Murley score (CMS), Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain and VAS disability scores were noted compared to the conservative group. Nonetheless, the re-tear rate was high following mini-open repair in this study (~75%).
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics