Similar 2-yr outcome between interference screw and suture anchor fixation of biceps tenod .
This study has been identified as potentially high impact.
OE's AI-driven High Impact metric estimates the influence a paper is likely to have by integrating signals from both the journal in which it is published and the scientific content of the article itself.
Developed using state-of-the-art natural language processing, the OE High Impact model more accurately predicts a study's future citation performance than journal impact factor alone.
This enables earlier recognition of clinically meaningful research and helps readers focus on articles most likely to shape future practice.
A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Interference Screw and Suture Anchor Techniques for Biceps Tenodesis
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):440-44880 patients with a rotator cuff tear and concomitant lesion of the biceps tendon were randomized to tenodesis fixation with either an interference screw or suture anchor. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years for pain, function, range of motion, and incidence of anatomic failure on MRI or ultrasonography. Results demonstrated no statistically significant differences between groups for any of the above-mentioned outcome measures.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics