ACE Report Cover
Sham Surgery Versus Labral Repair or Biceps Tenodesis for Type II SLAP Lesions of The Shoulder
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
SPORTS MEDICINE
Sham Surgery Versus Labral Repair or Biceps Tenodesis for Type II SLAP Lesions of The Shoulder .
High Impact
This study has been identified as potentially high impact. OE's AI-driven High Impact metric estimates the influence a paper is likely to have by integrating signals from both the journal in which it is published and the scientific content of the article itself. Developed using state-of-the-art natural language processing, the OE High Impact model more accurately predicts a study's future citation performance than journal impact factor alone. This enables earlier recognition of clinically meaningful research and helps readers focus on articles most likely to shape future practice.

Sham surgery versus labral repair or biceps tenodesis for type II SLAP lesions of the shoulder: a three-armed randomised clinical tria

Br J Sports Med. 2017 Dec;51(24):1759-1766.

One hundred eighteen patients with symptomatic, isolated type II SLAP (superior labrum anterior-posterior) lesions were randomized to receive either labral repair (n=40), biceps tenodesis (n=39), or sham surgery (n=39). The primary outcomes of interest were the Rowe score (0-100) and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) at 6 and 24 months. Secondary outcomes included the Oxford Instability Shoulder Score, pain change, EuroQol (EQ-5D and EQ-VAS), patient satisfaction, and complications. Outcomes were assessed up to 24 months postoperatively. Overall, the results revealed that all groups demonstrated significant improvement over time; however, there were no significant differences between labral repair, biceps tenodesis, and sham surgery in any outcome at any follow-up time point. These findings suggest that neither labral repair nor biceps tenodesis provided a significant clinical benefit over sham surgery in this population.

Unlock the Full ACE Report

You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence
content for as little as $1.99 per week.
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

Cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Sham Surgery Versus Labral Repair or Biceps Tenodesis for Type II SLAP Lesions of The Shoulder. ACE Report. 2025;307(3):23. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/sham-surgery-versus-labral-repair-or-biceps-tenodesis-for-type-ii-slap-lesions-of-the-shoulder

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report