ACE Report Cover
RSA of Implant Migration in Robotic vs Conventional BCS Cemented TKA
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
ARTHROPLASTY
RSA of Implant Migration in Robotic vs Conventional BCS Cemented TKA .

Radiostereometric measurement of implant migration in robotically assisted vs conventional bi-cruciate stabilized cemented total knee arthroplasty: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Acta Orthop . 2025 Mar 24:96:283-289.

Fifty-one patients with osteoarthritis were randomized to receive robotically assisted (n=26) or conventional (n=25) cemented bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty. The primary outcome was maximum total point motion (MTPM) of the tibial component at 1 and 2 years, measured via radiostereometric analysis. Secondary outcomes included tibial rotations (x-, y-, z-axes), subsidence, and lift-off. Follow-up assessments were performed at 3, 12, and 24 months. Overall, the robotic group demonstrated higher MTPM at both 12 months and 24 months, as well as greater flexion/extension rotation at 24 months. Migration between 12–24 months did not differ significantly between groups. These findings suggest robotic assistance resulted in greater early migration, though all values remained within accepted safe thresholds.

Unlock the Full ACE Report

You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence
content for as little as $1.99 per week.
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

Cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. RSA of Implant Migration in Robotic vs Conventional BCS Cemented TKA. ACE Report. 2025;307(8):34. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/rsa-of-implant-migration-in-robotic-vs-conventional-bcs-cemented-tka

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report