Rehabilitation vs. Surgical Reconstruction for Non-acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Rehabilitation versus surgical reconstruction for non-acute anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL SNNAP): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
Lancet. 2022 20-Aug;():. 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01424-6316 patients with non-acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and persistent instability were randomized to receive immediate surgery (n=156) or rehabilitation (n=160). The primary outcome of interest was the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - 4 domain (KOOS4). Secondary outcomes of interest included quality of life measures, the Tegner activity score, resource use, complications and patient satisfaction. Primary follow-up occurred at 18 months. The results of this study found that, whilst both groups showed improvement, patients who received immediate surgery had significantly better knee function, pain, patient satisfaction, and Tegner activity scores compared to the rehabilitation group. Surgery was found to have a 72% chance of being cost-effective vs. rehabilitation.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
