Regional vs General Anaesthesia and 12-Month Cognitive Outcomes After Hip-Fracture Surgery
Incidence of 12-month postoperative cognitive decline following regional vs. general anaesthesia in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: follow-up of the RAGA trial.
Anaesthesia . 2025 Jul;80(7):771-780.Nine-hundred and fifty patients with hip fracture were randomised to general anaesthesia (n=474) or regional anaesthesia without sedation (n=476); the 12-month cognitive follow-up analysis included two-hundred and ninety-three patients (general n=139; regional n=154). The primary outcome was 12-month postoperative cognitive decline (MMSE-based Z-score approach versus population controls). Secondary outcomes included severity of decline (major/mild), MMSE change from baseline, incident dementia, affective status (HADS), and health-related quality of life (SF-36). Outcomes were assessed pre-operatively, at 7 days, and up to 12 months. Overall, the results of the study revealed no difference in 12-month cognitive decline between groups, with similar rates of major decline (8.6% vs 8.5%) and comparable MMSE trajectories, dementia, HADS, and SF-36 scores. In short, the choice of regional versus general anaesthesia did not alter 1-year cognitive outcomes after hip-fracture surgery.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics