ACE Report Cover
PENG+LFCN vs FICB for Motor-Sparing Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
ARTHROPLASTY
PENG+LFCN vs FICB for Motor-Sparing Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty .

Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Associated with Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN) Block Versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) for Total Hip Replacement Surgery: Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Pers Med . 2025 Jun 3;15(6):230.

Fifty-eight patients undergoing direct anterior approach THA were randomized to receive Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) with lateral femoral cutaneous (PENG+LFCN)(n=29) or the Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB), (n=29) under a standardized spinal and multimodal analgesic regimen. The primary outcome was quadriceps strength (MRC) at 6 h. Secondary outcomes included active hip flexion, static/dynamic pain (NRS) at 6/24/48 h, opioid consumption (MME), time to ambulation, and adverse events. Outcomes were assessed up to 48 h. Overall, the results showed higher MRC scores at 6 h with PENG+LFCN, alongside greater hip flexion at all time points, lower pain scores, and markedly reduced opioid use. These findings suggest PENG+LFCN offers superior motor-sparing analgesia and early functional advantages over FICB after THA.

Unlock the Full ACE Report

You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence
content for as little as $1.99 per week.
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

Cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. PENG+LFCN vs FICB for Motor-Sparing Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty. ACE Report. 2025;307(9):19. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/peng-lfcn-vs-ficb-for-motor-sparing-analgesia-in-total-hip-arthroplasty

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report