Home
Ask OE
ACE Reports
All Specialties All Specialties All Specialties Arthroplasty Arthroplasty Arthroplasty Foot & Ankle Foot & Ankle Foot & Ankle General Orthopaedics General Orthopaedics General Orthopaedics Hand & Wrist Hand & Wrist Hand & Wrist Metabolic Disorders Metabolic Disorders Metabolic Disorders Osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis Pediatric Orthopaedics Pediatric Orthopaedics Pediatric Orthopaedics Peri-Operative Peri-Operative Peri-Operative Physical Therapy & Rehab Physical Therapy & Rehab Physio & Rehab Shoulder & Elbow Shoulder & Elbow Shoulder & Elbow Spine Spine Spine Sports Medicine Sports Medicine Sports Medicine Trauma Trauma Trauma Tumour Tumour Tumour Author Interviews Author Interviews Author Interviews Conference Report Conference Report Conference Reports
Original Content
All Topics All Topics All Topics Education Education Education Innovation Innovation Innovation Leadership Leadership Leadership Other Other Other Personal Growth Personal Growth Personal Growth Practice Practice Practice Research Research Research
News
All News All News All News Innovation Innovation Innovation Other Other Other Research Research Research
Videos
All Videos All Videos All Videos Education Education Education Innovation Innovation Innovation Leadership Leadership Leadership Personal Growth Personal Growth Personal Growth Practice Practice Practice Research Research Research Webinars Webinars Webinars
About
Search
1 Avatar
Notifications
My Favorites
My Specialties & Interests
Newsletter Subscriptions
Unlock Notification.
To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trail account.
Basic Search
OR
Ask OE AI Search
Previous Ace Report OTA 2015: Immediate, short-term effect of liposomal bupvicaine in ankle fracture fixation Next Ace Report OTA 2015: Immediate, short-term effect of liposomal bupvicaine in ankle fracture fixation
ACE Report Cover
Trauma
OTA 2015: Comparison of first- & second-generation locking plate for distal femur fracture
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
TRAUMA
OTA 2015: Comparison of first- & second-generation locking plate for distal femur fracture .

Fixed-Angle Versus Polyaxial Locking Plate Fixation Systems for Periprosthetic and/or Osteoporotic Distal Femoral Fractures

Contributing Authors

N Kanakaris O Obakponovwe M Costa D Shaw K Mohanty P Giannoudis

40 patients with distal femoral fractures (osteoporotic or periprosthetic) were randomized to undergo fixation with either a polyaxial locking plate (Polyax; BIOMET) or first-generation locking plate (LISS; DePuy/SYNTHES). The purpose of the study was to compare the union rates and clinical outcomes between the two plate designs. The results indicated comparable union rates and clinical outcomes between the groups. Similar length of hospital stay and surgical outcomes were noted as well.

Unlock the Full ACE Report

You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence
content for as little as $1.99 per week.
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Start Free Trail
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with

OR
Forgot Password?
OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Translate ACE Report
English (US) Portuguese French Spanish German Arabic

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

Cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. OTA 2015: Comparison of first- & second-generation locking plate for distal femur fracture. ACE Report. 2015;4(10):29. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/ota-2015-comparison-of-first-second-generation-locking-plate-for-distal-femur-fracture

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Upgrade to Premium!
Share this ACE Report