Osteoporosis: Mail-based intervention sent to patients and physicians is cost-effective .
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Cost-effectiveness of two inexpensive postfracture osteoporosis interventions: results of a randomized trial
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 May;98(5):1991-2000. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-1034. Epub 2013 Apr 17Exclusive Author Interview
Dr. Bill Leslie discusses the cost-effectiveness of two inexpensive postfracture osteoporosis interventions.
4264 patients who had recently suffered a major osteoporotic fracture were randomized to receive one of two mail-based interventions: a letter addressed to their primary care physician, or a letter addressed to both the patient and their primary care physician, which contained general information on the treatment of osteoporosis and the reasons behind its effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to determine if these inexpensive interventions proved to be cost-effective over a lifetime. Results indicated that the physician + patient intervention resulted in decreased total lifetime costs and increased quality-adjusted-life-years, compared to both the physician-only intervention and usual care.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
