Operative versus nonoperative management of distal radius fracture in elderly patients .
Safety and Efficacy of Operative Versus Nonsurgical Management of Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Mar;41(3):404-13Two randomized controlled trials and 6 cohort studies (n=858) evaluating the differences between operative and nonoperative treatment of a distal radius fracture in elderly patients were included in this meta-analysis and systematic review. The study was conducted in order to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of either external fixation or open reduction and internal fixation as compared to closed reduction and cast immobilization. Comparable pain, function, range of motion, and risk of minor complications was noted between operative and nonoperative managment strategies, while pooled results demonstrated significantly favourable grip strength and radiographic outcomes following operative management versus nonoperative management. However, a significantly greater risk of major complication was also noted among operatively treated groups.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics