ACE Report Cover
Open Reduction & Internal Fixation Vs Primary Arthrodesis for Displaced Lisfranc Injuries
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
FOOT & ANKLE
Open Reduction & Internal Fixation Vs Primary Arthrodesis for Displaced Lisfranc Injuries .

Open Reduction Internal Fixation vs Primary Arthrodesis for Displaced Lisfranc Injuries: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Foot Ankle Int . 2024 Jun;45(6):612-620.

Forty-three patients with displaced Lisfranc injuries were randomized to receive open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF, n=22) or primary arthrodesis (PA, n=21). The primary outcome was the Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) score at 24 months. Secondary outcomes included subscales of the VAS-FA (pain, function, and complaints) and the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Midfoot Scale, assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months. Overall, the results revealed no significant differences in VAS-FA or AOFAS scores between the two groups across all follow-up points. Both ORIF and PA appear to be viable initial surgical methods for displaced Lisfranc injuries. However, the study was underpowered to detect smaller differences, suggesting further research is needed.

Unlock the Full ACE Report

You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence
content for as little as $1.99 per week.
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

Cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Open Reduction & Internal Fixation Vs Primary Arthrodesis for Displaced Lisfranc Injuries. ACE Report. 2024;306(11):47. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/open-reduction-internal-fixation-vs-primary-arthrodesis-for-displaced-lisfranc-injuries

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report