No differences in conventional and computer navigated ACL reconstruction .
Does computer navigation system really improve early clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Knee. 2012 Mar;19(2):73-7. Epub 2011 Apr 15 randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials were identified that compared early clinical results of computer navigated and conventional anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction methods at 24-28 months. Results indicated there were no significant differences in primary outcomes including pivot shift test, Lachman test, IKDC, Lysholm and Tegner outcomes between the two groups.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
