ACE Report Cover
Low-Level Laser Therapy Vs Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
OSTEOARTHRITIS
Low-Level Laser Therapy Vs Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis .

Laser therapy versus pulsed electromagnetic field therapy as treatment modalities for early knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

BMC Geriatr . 2023 Mar 16;23(1):144.
Contributing Authors

M Elboim-Gabyzon F Nahhas

Forty patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomized to receive either low-level laser therapy (LLLT; n=20) or pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMFT; n=20). Outcomes of interest were pain at rest, during walking, during sitting to stand, and while walking upstairs, all measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) was used to measure pain, stiffness, and function. Additionally, the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and 10-m walking test were also assessed after 3 weeks. Between-group comparisons for VAS at rest, rising to stand, stairs, and WOMAC total score, pain, and function were all significantly better after 3 weeks in the PEMFT group. TUG scores were also significantly better in the PEMFT group.

Unlock the Full ACE Report

You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence
content for as little as $1.99 per week.
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

Cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Low-Level Laser Therapy Vs Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis. ACE Report. 2023;303(6):2. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/low-level-laser-therapy-vs-pulsed-electromagnetic-field-therapy-for-knee-osteoarthritis

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report