ACE Report Cover
Long term pain relief better with rESWT versus corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Idioma
Download Download Download
Descarregar
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citar
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favoritos
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Idioma
Download Download Download
Descarregar
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citar
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favoritos
HAND & WRIST
Long term pain relief better with rESWT versus corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome .
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2019;7(7):4 BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jan 25;19(1):32

25 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome were randomized to treatment with either a single session of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy or a single corticosteroid injection. Primary outcome was the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, including both the Symptoms and Functional scores. Patients were assessed at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment. Within-group reductions from baseline in BCTQ scores were significant from 4 weeks to 24 weeks in the rESWT group, in contrast to only 1 week to 4 weeks in the corticosteroid injection group. The reduction in scores from 12 weeks to 24 weeks were significantly greater in the rESWT compared to the corticosteroid injection for each of the BCTQ total score, Symptoms subscore, and Functional subscore.


Detalhes do financiamento da publicação +
Financiamento:
Non-Industry funded
Patrocinador:
Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
Conflitos:
None disclosed

Risco de viés

7/10

Critérios de notificação

18/21

Índice de Fragilidade

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

Sim = 1

Incerto = 0,5

Não relevante = 0

Não = 0

A Avaliação dos Critérios de Relato avalia a transparência com que os autores relatam as caraterísticas metodológicas e do ensaio na publicação. A avaliação está dividida em cinco categorias que são apresentadas de seguida.

4/4

Randomization

3/4

Outcome Measurements

4/4

Inclusion / Exclusion

4/4

Therapy Description

3/5

Statistics

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

O Índice de Fragilidade é uma ferramenta que auxilia na interpretação de achados significativos, fornecendo uma medida de força para um resultado. O Índice de Fragilidade representa o número de eventos consecutivos que precisam de ser adicionados a um resultado dicotómico para que o resultado deixe de ser significativo. Um número pequeno representa um resultado mais fraco e um número grande representa um resultado mais forte.

Porque é que este estudo era necessário agora?

Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common condition, with a number of studies performed on its incidence in both working and elderly populations. Corticosteroid injections are often administered prior to consideration of surgery, though long-term effectiveness of this option has been questioned. A more recent modality in conservative management is extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT), with particular interest in radial ESWT as opposed to focused ESWT. However, comparative efficacy of rESWT and corticosteroid injection has not been previously studied in a randomized controlled trial.

Qual era a principal questão de investigação?

In treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, how does disease-specific pain and function compare between patients administered a single dose of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy vs. patients administered a single injection of triamcinolone, assessed over 24-week follow-up?

Caraterísticas do estudo +
População:
25 patients, over the age of 18 years, with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome, based on physical examination and electrodiagnostic examination.
Intervenção:
rESWT group: Patients underwent a single session of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy, with settings of 4 Bar, 15Hz frequency, and 5000 shocks for 3-7 minutes. (n=13; 11 completed) (Mean age: 46+/-9)
Comparação:
Corticosteroid injection group: Injection was performed 1cm proximal to wrist flexion crease, and advanced 1cm to within the flexor retinaculum. Injection was performed using a solution containing 1mL triamcinolone acetonide 10mg and 1mL lidocaine 1%. (n=12; 12 completed) (Mean age: 53+/-12)
Resultados:
Primary outcome was the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom and Functional Score. Secondary outcomes included pain on a visual analog scale and electrodiagnostic parameters, including median peak sensory latency, sensory nerve action potential amplitude, and compound muscle action potential amplitude.
Métodos:
RCT
Tempo:
Follow-up was scheduled for 1, 4, 12 and 24 weeks after treatment. Electrodiagnostic assessment was only performed at 12 weeks after treatment.
Quais foram os resultados importantes?
  • Reduction in total BCTQ score from baseline was statistically significant within the rESWT group after 4, 12, and 24 weeks, and within the corticosteroid injection group after 1 week only. When comparing between groups, the reduction in score from 12 weeks to 24 weeks was significantly greater in the rESWT group compared to the corticosteroid injection group (p=0.015).
  • Reduction in BCTQ Symptom score from baseline was statistically significant within the rESWT group after 4, 12, and 24 weeks, and within the corticosteroid injection group after 1 and 4 weeks. When comparing between groups, the reduction in score from 12 weeks to 24 weeks was significantly greater in the rESWT group compared to the corticosteroid injection group (p=0.015).
  • Reduction in BCTQ Functional score from baseline was statistically significant within the rESWT group after 12 and 24 weeks, and within the corticosteroid injection group at no follow-up time point. When comparing between groups, the reduction in score from 12 weeks to 24 weeks was significantly greater in the rESWT group compared to the corticosteroid injection group (p=0.015).
  • Reduction in VAS pain score from baseline was statistically significant within the rESWT group after 12 and 24 weeks, and within the corticosteroid injection group at no follow-up time point.
  • Both groups demonstrated significant reduction in peak sensory distal latency from baseline to 12 weeks, while neither group demonstrated a significant change in SNAP amplitude, motor distal latency, or CMAP amplitude.
De que é que me devo lembrar mais?

In treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, one session of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy demonstrated significant reduction in disease-specific pain and functional limitation relative to pre-treatment values after 12 and 24 weeks, and demonstrated significantly greater reduction in disease-specific pain and functional limitation between 12 and 24 weeks when compared to that achieved by a single corticosteroid injection.

Como é que isto afectará o tratamento dos meus doentes?

The results of this study suggest that one session of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy may possess greater therapeutic efficacy for reducing symptomatic pain and functional limitation associated with carpal tunnel syndrome when compared to a single corticosteroid injection. A particular limitation is the small study size, with data from only 25 patients. Further studies should be planned with a large sample of patients. In the current study, differences in efficacy did not appear until 12- to 24-week follow-up, suggesting more maintained reduction in symptoms over time with rESWT in contrast to early onset of relief generally seen within corticosteroid injection. The duration of efficacy following rESWT should be studied in future studies, as 24 weeks is likely not sufficient enough to identify regression in efficacy and potential return of symptoms.

AVISO LEGAL

O conteúdo desta página destina-se apenas a fins informativos e não pretende substituir o aconselhamento, diagnóstico ou tratamento médico profissional. Se necessitar de tratamento médico, procure sempre o conselho do seu médico ou dirija-se ao serviço de urgência mais próximo. As opiniões, crenças e pontos de vista expressos pelos indivíduos no conteúdo encontrado nesta página não reflectem as opiniões, crenças e pontos de vista da OrthoEvidence.

0 de 4 artigos mensais GRATUITOS desbloqueados
Atingiu o seu limite de 4 visualizações de artigos gratuitos este mês

Aceda à OrthoEvidence por apenas $1,99 por semana.

Mantenha-se ligado às últimas evidências. Cancele a qualquer altura.
  • Avaliações críticas dos mais recentes ensaios clínicos aleatórios de alto impacto e revisões sistemáticas em ortopedia
  • Acesso ao conteúdo do podcast OrthoEvidence, incluindo colaborações com o Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, entrevistas com cirurgiões reconhecidos internacionalmente e discussões em mesa redonda sobre notícias e tópicos ortopédicos
  • Subscrição do The Pulse, um boletim informativo duas vezes por semana baseado em evidências, concebido para o ajudar a tomar melhores decisões clínicas
Upgrade
Close Dialog
Bem-vindo de volta!
Esqueceu-se da palavra-passe?
Comece hoje o seu teste GRATUITO!

A sua conta será afiliada a
e inclui acesso gratuito ao OrthoEvidence


OU
Esqueceu-se da palavra-passe?

OU
Verifique o seu e-mail

Se existir uma conta com o endereço de e-mail fornecido, ser-lhe-á enviado um e-mail de reposição da palavra-passe. Se não vir uma mensagem de correio eletrónico, verifique a sua pasta de spam ou de lixo eletrónico.

Para obter mais assistência, contacte a nossa equipa de apoio.

Inicie sessão para ativar esta funcionalidade

Para aceder a esta funcionalidade, tem de iniciar sessão numa conta OrthoEvidence ativa. Inicie a sessão ou crie uma conta de avaliação GRATUITA.

Traduzir o Relatório ACE

A OrthoEvidence utiliza um serviço de tradução de terceiros para tornar o conteúdo acessível em vários idiomas. Tenha em atenção que, embora sejam feitos todos os esforços para garantir a exatidão, as traduções podem nem sempre ser perfeitas.

Como citar isto ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Long term pain relief better with rESWT versus corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome. OE Journal. 2019;7(7):4. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/long-term-pain-relief-better-with-reswt-versus-corticosteroid-injection-for-carpal-tunnel-syndrome

Copie a citação
Inicie sessão para ativar esta funcionalidade

Para aceder a esta funcionalidade, tem de iniciar sessão numa conta OrthoEvidence ativa. Inicie a sessão ou crie uma conta de avaliação GRATUITA.

Funcionalidade de Membro Premium

Para aceder a esta funcionalidade, tem de ter sessão iniciada numa conta Premium da OrthoEvidence.

Partilhe isto ACE Report