Long-term Outcomes of Cemented vs. Cementless Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty .
Long-term effects of cemented and cementless fixations of total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Oct 12;16(1): 590.Eight randomized controlled trials with a total of 1,123 patients undergoing a primary total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis were included in this meta-analysis comparing cemented and cementless fixation. Outcomes of interest included implant survival, Knee Society knee, function, and pain scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), range of motion, incidence of radiolucent lines, and maximum total point motion. Included studies had a minimum follow-up of 8.8 years. Meta-analysis results revealed no significant difference between the two groups in implant survival, clinical scores, or range of motion. However, the incidence of radiolucent lines was significantly lower in the cementless group, whilst maximum total point motion was significantly lower in the cemented group.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics