Lateral branch neurotomy for sacroiliac joint pain improves pain and physical function .
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2013;1(14):10 Pain Med. 2012 Mar;13(3):383-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01328.x. Epub 2012 Feb 2Exclusive Author Interview
Dr. Patel discusses the use of lateral branch neurotomy for sacroiliac joint pain improves pain and physical function
51 patients experiencing sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain were randomized on a 2:1 basis into two groups to either receive lateral branch radiofrequency (RF) neurotomy or a sham treatment. Following assessments over a 9 month period, results indicated that patients who underwent lateral branch RF neurotomy treatment noticed a significant decrease in pain, disability, and an increase in physical function.
Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?
Was allocation adequately concealed?
Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?
Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?
Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?
Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?
Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?
Oui = 1
Incertain = 0,5
Non pertinent = 0
Non = 0
L'évaluation des critères de rapport permet d'évaluer la transparence avec laquelle les auteurs rapportent les caractéristiques méthodologiques et les caractéristiques de l'essai dans la publication. L'évaluation est divisée en cinq catégories qui sont présentées ci-dessous.
3/4
Randomization
4/4
Outcome Measurements
4/4
Inclusion / Exclusion
4/4
Therapy Description
4/4
Statistics
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
L'indice de fragilité est un outil qui aide à l'interprétation des résultats significatifs, en fournissant une mesure de la force d'un résultat. L'indice de fragilité représente le nombre d'événements consécutifs qui doivent être ajoutés à un résultat dichotomique pour que le résultat ne soit plus significatif. Un petit nombre représente un résultat plus faible et un grand nombre un résultat plus fort.
Pourquoi cette étude était-elle nécessaire maintenant ?
Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is a common form of lower back pain. Intra-articular SIJ injections are normally used to treat the condition, but sometimes this method is ineffective or only provides short-term pain relief. Lateral branch RF neurotomy has been suggested as an alternative treatment for SIJ pain, but few studies have assessed the efficacy of this method. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of lateral branch RF neurotomy in pain management of SIJ pain.
Quelle était la principale question de recherche ?
Did lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy significantly decrease sacroiliac joint pain and increase physical function, when measured over a 9 month period?
- The mean improvement in NRS pain score at the 3 month assessment was significantly higher in the Lateral Branch Neurotomy group (-2.4 +/- 2.7) than in the Sham group (-0.8 +/- 2.4) (p=0.035)
- The mean improvements in SF-36 for bodily pain at the 1 and 3 month assessments were significantly higher in the Lateral Branch Neurotomy group (Month 1: 15 +/- 17, Month 3: 16 +/- 26) than in the Sham group (Month 1: 2 +/- 11, Month 3: -1 +/- 13) (Month 1: p=0.006, Month 3: p=0.019)
- The mean improvements in SF-36 for physical function at the 1 and 3 month assessments were significantly higher in the Lateral Branch Neurotomy group (Month 1: 10 +/- 17, Month 3: 14 +/- 19) than in the Sham group (Month 1: 5 +/- 12, Month 3: 3 +/- 12) (Month 1: p=0.238, Month 3: p=0.040)
- The mean improvements in ODI at the 1 and 3 month assessments were significantly higher in the Lateral Branch Neurotomy group (Month 1: -12 +/- 14, Month 3: -11 +/- 17) than in the Sham group (Month 1: -4 +/- 11, Month 3: 2 +/- 6) (Month 1: p=0.046, Month 3: p=0.011)
- The percentage of patients who had a positive GPE score (positive defined as “pain has decreased a lot”) at the 3 month assessment was significantly higher in the Lateral Branch Neurotomy group (47%) than in the Sham group (8%) (p<0.05)
- The mean AQoL score at the 3 month assessment was significantly higher in the Lateral Branch Neurotomy group (0.69 +/- 0.21) than in the Sham group (0.56 +/- 0.21) (p=0.048)
De quoi dois-je me souvenir en priorité ?
Patients who underwent lateral branch RF neurotomy experienced significant improvements in SIJ pain, disability, physical function, and quality of living compared to those who underwent the sham treatment.
Comment cela affectera-t-il les soins prodigués à mes patients ?
Patients who have failed to get pain alleviation after taking intra-articular SIJ injections are may benefit from lateral branch RF neurotomy. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are required to confirm the benefits.
AVIS DE NON-RESPONSABILITÉ
Le contenu de cette page est fourni à titre d'information uniquement et n'est pas destiné à remplacer un avis médical, un diagnostic ou un traitement professionnel. Si vous avez besoin d'un traitement médical, demandez toujours l'avis de votre médecin ou rendez-vous au service des urgences le plus proche. Les opinions, croyances et points de vue exprimés par les individus sur le contenu de cette page ne reflètent pas les opinions, croyances et points de vue d'OrthoEvidence.
0 de 4 articles mensuels GRATUITS débloqués
