ACE Report Cover
ISAKOS2017: Comparison of mechanical vs chemical thromboprophylaxis, including administration timing
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
ARTHROPLASTY
ISAKOS2017: Comparison of mechanical vs chemical thromboprophylaxis, including administration timing .

Comparison of efficacy and safety between mechanical pump, aspirin, and rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty

Contributing Authors

HS Han

105 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were included in this study to compare the efficacy of different venous thromboembolism prophylaxis techniques. Patients were randomized to one of five groups; mechanical prophylaxis, aspirin 100mg for 6 weeks, aspirin 300mg for 6 weeks, rivaroxaban 10mg for 2 weeks initiated at 24 hours or at 72 hours. The results from this study indicated no significant differences in the rate of DVT, drainage amount, hidden blood loss, the incidence fo ecchymoses and clinical outcomes. Patients in the rivaroxaban initiated at 24 hours postoperative had a greater proportion of complications compared to aspirin 100mg and the rivaroxaban initiated at 72 hours group had a greater proportion of patients receiving transfusions compared to aspirin 100mg.

Unlock the Full ACE Report

You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence
content for as little as $1.99 per week.
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

Cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. ISAKOS2017: Comparison of mechanical vs chemical thromboprophylaxis, including administration timing. ACE Report. 2017;6(7):49. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/isakos2017-comparison-of-mechanical-vs-chemical-thromboprophylaxis-including-administration-timing

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report