Improved function and time to union with plating versus sling for mid-shaft clavicle fractures
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Comparison of plate osteosynthesis versus non-operative management for mid-shaft clavicle fractures—A prospective study
Injury. 2018 Jun;49(6):1104-110769 patients with a closed, displaced clavicle fractures (Robinson type 2B) were randomized to surgery with open reduction and internal fixation with a plate, or to nonoperative treatment with an arm pouch sling. Patients were followed over 24-months of follow-up for union, incidences of nonunion and malunion, complications, and function through the Constant score. Results demonstrated no significant differences in the rate of nonunion between groups, though time to union was significantly shorter in the plate group compared to sling group. Additionally, function at 24 months was significantly greater in the plate group compared to the sling group.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
