High-Intensity Progressive Rehabilitation Vs Routine Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty .
High-Intensity Progressive Rehabilitation Versus Routine Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Arthroplasty . 2024 Mar;39(3):665-671.e2.91 patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis were randomized to receive either high-intensity progressive rehabilitation (n=45) or routine rehabilitation (n=46) after total knee arthroplasty. Outcomes of interest were the American Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS), patient satisfaction, pain on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), first time of standing after surgery, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), short-form 36 (SF-36), and length of hospital stay. Outcomes were assessed at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Overall, the results of the study revealed that the high-intensity progressive rehabilitation group had significantly better HSS scores, lower pain scores, higher patient satisfaction, earlier first standing time, longer walking distances, and shorter hospital stays. These findings suggest that high-intensity progressive rehabilitation is more effective than routine rehabilitation for enhancing recovery after total knee arthroplasty.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics