Focused Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound vs. Shortwave Diathermy for Knee Osteoarthritis .
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Efficacy and safety of focused low-intensity pulsed ultrasound versus pulsed shortwave diathermy on knee osteoarthritis: a randomized comparative trial
Sci Rep. 2022 01-Jul;():. 10.1038/s41598-022-17291-z114 patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomized to receive 12 days of focused low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy (n=57) or pulsed shortwave diathermy (n=57). The primary outcome of interest was functional capacity as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and associated sub-scores (pain; physical function; stiffness). Secondary outcomes of interest included Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, timed up-and-go test, range of motion, global rating of changes scores, and adverse events. Outcomes were assessed after the completion of treatment, and at 12 weeks and 24 weeks follow-up. Results revealed significantly better WOMAC scores and sub-scores, NRS scores, global rating of change scores, range of motion, and timed up-and-go test scores in the focused low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy group at 12 days (post-treatment). At 12 and 24 weeks, WOMAC total scores and NRS scores were also in favor of the focused low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy group.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
