Finned central-pegged vs conventional central-pegged all-poly glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty .
Radiographic comparison of finned, cementless central pegged glenoid component and conventional cemented pegged glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jun;27(6S):S10-S1654 patients scheduled for total shoulder arthroplasty were randomized to either a finned central-pegged or conventional central-pegged all-polyethylene glenoid component. Central pegs were cementless in the finned group and cemented in the conventional group. Patients were assessed for the incidence of radiolucency of the glenoid component within 2 years of surgery. Results demonstrated no significant difference between groups in the incidence of radiolucency of the glenoid component after 2 years.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
