ACE Report Cover
Effectiveness of exercise and manual therapy in osteoporotic vertebral fractures
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
言語
Download Download Download
ダウンロード
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
引用
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ お気に入り
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
言語
Download Download Download
ダウンロード
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
引用
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ お気に入り

SPINE

Effects of an exercise and manual therapy program on physical impairments, function, and quality-of-life in people with osteoporotic vertebral fracture: A randomised, single-blind controlled pilot trial
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2013;1(2):180 BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Feb 17;11:36.

20 patients (>50 yr of age) with a history of painful osteoporotic vertebral fracture were randomized to a structured exercise program or no treatment for a period of 10 weeks. At 11 weeks, it was observed that combined manual therapy and exercise were effective in reducing pain and improving physical function for patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.


出版資金提供の詳細 +
資金提供:
Non-funded
コンフリクト:
None disclosed

バイアスのリスク

7/10

報告基準

17/20

脆弱性指数

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

はい = 1

不確実=0.5

無関係 = 0

いいえ = 0

報告基準評価では、著者が出版物内で試験の方法論的特徴や試験特性を報告する際の透明性を評価します。評価は以下の5つのカテゴリーに分類されます。

3/4

Randomization

3/4

Outcome Measurements

4/4

Inclusion / Exclusion

4/4

Therapy Description

3/4

Statistics

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

Fragility Indexは、重要な所見の解釈を助けるツールで、結果の強さの尺度を提供します。Fragility Indexは、その所見が有意でなくなるために、二項対立の結果に追加する必要がある連続した事象の数を表します。数値が小さいほど弱い所見を表し、数値が大きいほど強い所見を表します。

なぜ今この研究が必要なのですか?

Pharmacological therapy is the primary treatment for patients with vertebral fractures. However, the majority of the drugs have no direct effect on pain and physical impairments that patients experience. There is a dearth of literature that investigates the role of physiotherapy in patients with vertebral fractures, which is alluded to in this study.

主な研究課題は何ですか?

In people with a history of painful osteoporotic vertebral fracture, what is the effectiveness of a physiotherapy program in reducing pain after 10 weeks?

研究の特徴 +
人口:
20 patients (age range 53-90 yr; 3M 17F) with a history of painful osteoporotic vertebral fracture (confirmed by a lateral spinal radiograph and DEXA scan of the hip and spine to diagnose osteoporosis based on WHO criteria). Patients were asked to not seek any other forms of treatment during the study period, medication was permitted due to ethical reasons.
介入:
Physiotherapy group: Participants attended 10 weekly sessions, of physiotherapy, with a standardized treatment protocol of taping, exercises, and manual therapy, designed to improve back pain, posture, thoracic spine mobility, and trunk control, as well as provide education on the etiology and self-management measures of osteoporosis. Each session lasted for approximately 45 minutes. Participants were also taught exercises to be completed at home. Exercises regarding posture and range of motion were to be completed daily, while exercises pertaining to strengthening and trunk control were to be performed thrice weekly (Mean age: 66.2; n=11, 7F/4M).
比較:
Control group: Participants were not treated with any additional physiotherapy intervention or home exercises (Mean age: 66.3; n=9, 9F).
アウトカム:
Primary Outcome Measure: Average back pain during movement
方法:
Prospective, Single-Center, Pilot RCT
時間:
Baseline and 11 week evaluations

重要な知見は?

  • After the 10-week trial, the intervention group had a statistically significant reduction in pain during movement and at rest, compared to the control group.
  • There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in the time loaded standing test; the intervention group experienced an improvement in trunk and arm muscle endurance, while the control group experienced deterioration.
  • A statistically significant difference in physical function was observed between the intervention group had an improvement in the Qualeffo physical function score compared with the control group.
  • The two groups did not differ with respect to the AQoL scores and changes in thoracic kyphosis.
  • 82% of patients with the physical therapy, compared to 11% of patients in control group, judged their pain to be much better than at the time of enrollment.
最も覚えておくべきことは?

Study findings showed that patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures experienced reduction in pain and improvement in physical function after undergoing a 10-week physiotherapy program. As this was a pilot study with a small sample size, the results should be interpreted with caution and necessitate confirmation with a larger sample size RCT.

それが私の患者ケアにどのように影響するか?

In treating patients with a history of painful osteoporotic vertebral fracture, a structured monitored physiotherapy program with an expert clinician and regular home exercises may be effective in improving quality of life parameters of patients. However, due to the small sample size of participants featured in this trial, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions on the efficacy of the physiotherapy regimen used in this trial. Additional research, including outcome at follow-up, is necessary to further examine the physiotherapy's effect on pain in osteoporotic individuals.

免責事項

このページに記載されている内容は、情報提供のみを目的としたものであり、専門的な医療アドバイス、診断、治療の代わりとなるものではありません。治療が必要な場合は、必ず医師の診断を仰ぐか、最寄りの救急外来を受診してください。このページに記載されている内容に関して個人が表明した意見、信念、見解は、OrthoEvidenceの意見、信念、見解を反映するものではありません。

0の4 月間無料記事のロック解除
今月の無料記事閲覧数が4件に達しました。

週1.99ドルからOrthoEvidenceにアクセスできます。

最新のエビデンスにアクセスしてください。いつでもキャンセルできます。
  • 整形外科における最新のインパクトのあるランダム化比較試験とシステマティックレビューの批判的評価
  • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgeryとのコラボレーション、国際的に著名な外科医へのインタビュー、整形外科ニュースやトピックに関する座談会など、OrthoEvidenceポッドキャストコンテンツへのアクセス
  • 週2回発行されるエビデンスに基づくニュースレター、The Pulseの購読。
Upgrade
Close Dialog
おかえりなさい
パスワードをお忘れですか?
今すぐ無料トライアルを開始

あなたのアカウントは
OrthoEvidenceへの無料アクセスが含まれます。


または
パスワードをお忘れですか?

または
Eメールをご確認ください

入力されたメールアドレスにアカウントが存在する場合、パスワードリセットのメールが送信されます。メールが届かない場合は、迷惑メールフォルダをご確認ください。

その他のサポート サポートチームまでご連絡ください。.

この機能を有効にするにはログインしてください

この機能にアクセスするには、有効なOrthoEvidenceアカウントにログインする必要があります。ログインするか、無料トライアルアカウントを作成してください。

ACEレポートを翻訳

OrthoEvidenceは、多言語でコンテンツにアクセスできるようにするため、第三者の翻訳サービスを利用しています。正確性を確保するためにあらゆる努力をしていますが、翻訳が必ずしも完璧ではない可能性があることにご注意ください。

引用方法 ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Effectiveness of exercise and manual therapy in osteoporotic vertebral fractures. OE Journal. 2013;1(2):180. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/effectiveness-of-exercise-and-manual-therapy-in-osteoporotic-vertebral-fractures

引用のコピー
この機能を有効にするにはログインしてください

この機能にアクセスするには、有効なOrthoEvidenceアカウントにログインする必要があります。ログインするか、無料トライアルアカウントを作成してください。

プレミアム会員機能

この機能にアクセスするには、OrthoEvidenceのプレミアムアカウントにログインする必要があります。

共有 ACE Report