TRAUMA
Early application of pulsed electromagnetic field in the treatment of postoperative delayed union of long-bone fractures: a prospective randomized controlled study
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2014;2(9):22 BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jan 19;14:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-35.64 patients with delayed union following a long-bone fracture were randomized to receive either an active or sham treatment of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy between 16 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to determine whether early application of PEMF is effective in improving union success rates in these patients. Results indicated that, although union success rates were similar between groups at the 3-month assessment, PEMF therapy was associated with a significantly higher union success rate at study completion, compared to the control group (77.4% versus 48.1%). The average length of treatment at the end of the study was similar between groups.
Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?
Was allocation adequately concealed?
Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?
Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?
Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?
Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?
Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?
はい = 1
不確実＝0.5
無関係 = 0
いいえ = 0
報告基準評価では、著者が出版物内で試験の方法論的特徴や試験特性を報告する際の透明性を評価します。評価は以下の5つのカテゴリーに分類されます。
3/4
Randomização
4/4
Medidas de resultado
4/4
Inclusão/Exclusão
3/4
Descrição do tratamento
4/4
Estatística
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
Fragility Indexは、重要な所見の解釈を助けるツールで、結果の強さの尺度を提供します。Fragility Indexは、その所見が有意でなくなるために、二項対立の結果に追加する必要がある連続した事象の数を表します。数値が小さいほど弱い所見を表し、数値が大きいほど強い所見を表します。
なぜ今この研究が必要なのですか？
A common complication associated with treatment of fractures is delayed union or nonunion. Conservative treatments to promote bone healing are typically administered when these fractures are infection- and defect-free. One approach - pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy - has previously been found to be effective, although the mechanism by which it carries out this effect is not well-known. Furthermore, some studies begin this treatment well after delayed union has been diagnosed (i.e. >6 months post-fracture), while others wait until nonunion is officially diagnosed. This study was needed to examine the efficacy of PEMF when applied early on, immediately following diagnosis of delayed union (i.e. approximately 16 weeks post-fracture).
主な研究課題は何ですか？
Is pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy effective in improving bone healing in patients with postoperative delayed union following a long-bone fracture?
重要な知見は？
- At 3 months, union success was found in 12 patients (38.7%) in the treatment group and 6 patients (22.2%) in the control group, a non-significant difference (RR 1.74; p=0.256).
- At study completion, the union success rate was significantly greater in the treatment group (24/31 or 77.4%; 95% CI 0.58 to 0.90) compared to the control group (13/27 or 48.1%; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.68) (RR 1.61; p=0.029).
- The average length of treatment was similar between groups at the end of the study (treatment: 4.8 months; control: 4.4 months) (p=0.489).
最も覚えておくべきことは？
Although union success rates were similar between groups at the 3-month assessment, pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy was associated with a significantly higher union success rate compared to the control group at study completion (77.4% versus 48.1%). The average length of treatment at the end of the study was similar between groups.
それが私の患者ケアにどのように影響するか？
Results from this study support the early application (i.e. 16 weeks to 6 months postoperatively) of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy in the treatment of patients with delayed union of long bone fractures. These findings are limited by varying degrees of damage in each patient, the small number of patients for each fracture location, and variability in the patients' activity levels. Future studies should determine whether there is a difference in patient outcome whether PEMF is administered at 16 weeks versus 6 months postoperatively.
免責事項
このページに記載されている内容は、情報提供のみを目的としたものであり、専門的な医療アドバイス、診断、治療の代わりとなるものではありません。治療が必要な場合は、必ず医師の診断を仰ぐか、最寄りの救急外来を受診してください。このページに記載されている内容に関して個人が表明した意見、信念、見解は、OrthoEvidenceの意見、信念、見解を反映するものではありません。
0の4 月間無料記事のロック解除
