Early Gains but No One-Year Difference Between Fixation and Bracing for Humeral Shaft Fracture .
Operative vs Nonoperative Management of Fractures of the Humeral Diaphysis: The Humeral Shaft Fracture Fixation Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Surg . 2025 May 1;160(5):508-516.Seventy patients with isolated, closed humeral shaft fractures (HSF) were randomized to operative fixation (n=36) or functional bracing (n=34). The primary outcome was the DASH score at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included EQ-5D/EQ-VAS, SF-12 PCS/MCS, pain, shoulder/elbow ROM, complications, radiographic alignment, and return to work/sport. Outcomes were assessed at 2 and 6 weeks and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Overall, the results revealed better DASH scores with surgery at 6 weeks and 3 months (p=.01 for both), but no differences at 6 or 12 months; surgery also improved early HRQoL and SF-12 MCS to 6 months, with higher return-to-sport rates. Brace-related dermatitis was more common with nonoperative care, and nonunion was numerically higher with bracing. These findings suggest early—but not sustained—advantages of fixation that must be weighed against operative risks.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics