Comparison of the recovery with propofol, dexmedetomidine, & remimazolam for upper limb surgery .
Comparison of the recovery profiles of propofol, dexmedetomidine, and remimazolam for intraoperative sedation in patients undergoing upper limb surgery under brachial plexus blockade: a randomized controlled trial.
Can J Anaesth. 2025 01-Jul:. 10.1007/s12630-025-02987-3Study Summary
120 patients scheduled for upper limb surgery under brachial plexus blockade were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive intraoperative sedation with propofol, dexmedetomidine, or remimazolam. One patient in the remimazolam group was excluded due to inadequate block and conversion to general anesthesia, resulting in 119 patients included in the final analysis. The primary outcome of interest was recovery time, defined as the time from completion of sedative infusion to achievement of a Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness and Sedation score of 5. Secondary outcomes included sedation onset time, post-anesthesia care unit length of stay, Modified Aldrete Score, Quality of Recovery–15 score, adverse events, and patient and surgeon satisfaction. Outcomes were assessed intraoperatively and during post-anesthesia recovery. Overall, the results of the study revealed that propofol produced the fastest recovery, followed by remimazolam and dexmedetomidine, while recovery-related secondary outcomes were similar across groups.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics