Comparison of General vs. Intraspinal Anesthesia in Lower Limb Fracture Surgery .
Comparison of General vs. Intraspinal Anesthesia in Lower Limb Fracture Surgery: A Prospective Study.
Altern Ther Health Med . 2024 Oct;30(10):274-277.Four hundred thirty-three patients with lower limb fractures were randomized to receive either general anesthesia (n=220) or intraspinal anesthesia (n=213). The primary outcome of interest was surgical safety, assessed by comparing postoperative adverse events. Secondary outcomes included anesthesia duration, operative time, length of hospital stay, and laboratory indices such as hemoglobin, serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine. Outcomes were assessed postoperatively. Overall, the results of the study revealed no significant differences between the two groups regarding anesthesia duration, operative time, length of hospital stay, laboratory indices, or adverse events (P > .05). The findings suggest that both general and intraspinal anesthesia are effective and safe for lower limb fracture surgery, allowing for patient-specific selection of anesthesia methods.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics