ACE Report Cover
Comparing a 12-month home exercise program with usual care for post-TKA rehabilitation
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Langue
Download Download Download
Télécharger
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citer
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favoris
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Langue
Download Download Download
Télécharger
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citer
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favoris

PHYSICAL THERAPY & REHAB

Efficacy of a 12-month, monitored home exercise programme compared with normal care commencing 2 months after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2014;2(7):18 J Rehabil Med. 2014 Jan 30;46(2):166-72. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1242

108 patients with diagnosed knee osteoarthritis (OA) who had underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were randomized to undergo, beginning 2 months post-surgery, either a 12-month home-based exercise program, or usual care. The purpose of this study was to determine whether this long-term exercise regimen improved pain, disability, quality of life and function in these patients when compared to usual care. Upon the completion of the intervention, results indicated that the exercise and control groups displayed similar improvements in WOMAC scores (pain, stiffness and function), quality of life, knee extension strength, and range of motion. Moreover, patients in the exercise group exhibited significantly superior improvements in knee flexion strength and maximal walking speed.


Détails du financement de la publication +
Financement:
Non-Industry funded
Sponsor:
Grant from the Central Finland Health Care District
Conflits:
None disclosed

Risque de partialité

7/10

Critères de déclaration

18/20

Indice de fragilité

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

Oui = 1

Incertain = 0,5

Non pertinent = 0

Non = 0

L'évaluation des critères de rapport permet d'évaluer la transparence avec laquelle les auteurs rapportent les caractéristiques méthodologiques et les caractéristiques de l'essai dans la publication. L'évaluation est divisée en cinq catégories qui sont présentées ci-dessous.

4/4

Randomization

3/4

Outcome Measurements

4/4

Inclusion / Exclusion

3/4

Therapy Description

4/4

Statistics

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

L'indice de fragilité est un outil qui aide à l'interprétation des résultats significatifs, en fournissant une mesure de la force d'un résultat. L'indice de fragilité représente le nombre d'événements consécutifs qui doivent être ajoutés à un résultat dichotomique pour que le résultat ne soit plus significatif. Un petit nombre représente un résultat plus faible et un grand nombre un résultat plus fort.

Pourquoi cette étude était-elle nécessaire maintenant ?

The optimal postoperative rehabilitation regimen following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not yet been conclusively determined. Previous studies suggest that functional physical therapy exercises may improve patient outcome at 3-4 months, however these benefits may no longer be significant at 1 year. Furthermore, the results from one study suggest that home-based rehabilitation may yield improved pain and disability compared to in-patient rehabilitation. Home-based interventions were proposed as a means to eliminate some of the disadvantages associated with in-patient rehabilitation, such as increased cost, the requirement for trained personnel, as well as the burden of transportation and time-commitment on behalf of the patients. The present study compared the effectiveness of a long-term home-based rehabilitation protocol with that of usual care in patients who had undergone TKA.

Quelle était la principale question de recherche ?

Does a 12-month postoperative home-based exercise program improve pain, disability and quality of life in patients who have undergone total knee arthroplasty (TKA), when compared to usual care and assessed 14 months after surgery?

Caractéristiques de l'étude +
Population:
108 patients with diagnosed knee osteoarthritis, for which they had undergone primary arthroplasty. For all patients, full weight-bearing (or as much they could tolerate) was allowed on the second postoperative day. Furthermore, crutches were recommended for 4-5 weeks postoperatively, for safety reasons. Lastly, once discharged from the hospital, patients applied cold packs when necessary, and underwent a written exercise program up until 2 months post-surgery. This exercise program consisted of active and passive range of motion exercises and exercises for knee flexors and extensors, as well as hip abductors and extensors.
Intervention:
Exercise group: Patients in this group (n=53) were assigned, by a physiotherapist, an individualized exercise program each at baseline, and at 1 to 4 months thereafter. The program issued at baseline was characterized by isometric strengthening exercises for the quadriceps and hamstrings, functional exercises using the patient's body weight, and step exercises (step height of 20 cm), and was prescribed at a dose of 2 series of 10 repetitions daily, gradually increasing to a max of 20 reps and 3 series. At 3 months post-surgery (i.e. one month into the intervention), the new exercise program added squats, hack squats with back against the wall, and step exercises (step height of 30 cm), beginning at 15 reps of 1-2 kg dumbbells, 3 times a week. At 6 months post-surgery (i.e. 4 months into the intervention), patients were instructed to increase the progression of the aforementioned exercises, and exercise at a frequency of 3 times per week. (Mean age: 69 +/- 8 years; 57% female).
Comparaison:
Control group: Patients in this group (n=55) did not receive any additional guidance following the baseline measurements taken at 2 months post-surgery. This protocol is in accordance with usual care. (Mean age: 69 +/- 9 years; 65% female).
Résultats:
Outcomes included pain, disability (assessed on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)), health-related quality of life (measured using the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36)), basic mobility (via the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test), active and passive range of motion, maximal walking speed without shoes (using the GAITRite Walkway System (CIR Systems Inc., Sparta, USA)), as well as isometric knee flexion and extension strength (measured on a fixed dynamometer (Ds Europe, mod. 546QTD strain gauge, Milan, Italy).
Méthodes:
RCT; Single-blinded (assessors)
Durée de l'intervention:
Outcomes were assessed when the intervention started (i.e. 2 months post-surgery) and once the intervention was complete (i.e. 14 months post-surgery). In addition, SF-36 and WOMAC questionnaire were filled out 6 months from baseline.

Quels sont les résultats importants ?

  • At 14 months post-operation, WOMAC scores were significantly reduced in the exercise and control groups by -15 (95% CI -20 to -10) vs. -14 (95% CI -19 to -9) for pain, -25 (95% CI -32 to -18) vs. -17 (95% CI -24 to -9) for stiffness, and -18 (95% CI -24 to -12) vs. -13 (95% CI -19 to -8) for functional difficulty (p<0.001). These improvements were not significantly different between groups (p>0.05).
  • Mean changes in the physical and mental components of the SF-36 were significant in both groups following the 12-month intervention (p<0.001); however, there were no between-group differences at any time point (p>0.05).
  • Improvement in knee flexion strength was significantly better in the exercise group (4.4 [95% CI 3.1 to 5.7]) compared to the control group (2.4 [95% CI 1.3 to 3.4]) (p=0.009), improvement in knee extension strength was statistically similar between groups (Exercise group: 15.1 (95% CI 12.5 to 17.6); Control group: 13.4 (95% CI 10.1 to 16.1); p=0.50).
  • Maximal walking speed improved significantly more in the exercise group (0.32 [95% CI 0.26 to 0.38]) compared to the control group (0.17 [95% CI 0.11 to 0.24]) (p<0.001).
  • Passive extension deficit, active extension deficit, passive flexion and active flexion similarly improved from baseline to 12 months in both groups (p=0.72, p=0.45, p=0.86, and p=0.98, respectively).
  • At 6 months, 72% of participants in the exercise group reported performing the training sessions 2x/week. At 12 months, the proportion of patients exercising at least once a week, the mean exercise frequency, and the amount of leisure-time physical activity were all similar between groups (p>0.05).
  • 5 participants in the exercise group did not complete the exercise program, citing pain during exercise. An additional 5 participants in the exercise group did not complete the exercise program, citing satisfaction with painless knees, to the point where they were no longer motivated to complete exercise.
De quoi dois-je me souvenir en priorité ?

At 12 months, although the exercise and control groups displayed similar improvements in WOMAC scores (pain, stiffness and function), quality of life (both the mental and physical components), knee extension strength, and range of motion, patients in the exercise group exhibited significantly superior improvements in knee flexion strength and maximal walking speed. Adherence to the exercise program at 6 months was relatively low at 72%, and significantly more patients in the control group sought additional advice regarding their knee exercises.

Comment cela affectera-t-il les soins prodigués à mes patients ?

In patients with knee osteoarthritis who had undergone a total knee arthroplasty (TKA), a 12-month home-based exercise program is well-tolerated and may provide some functional benefits; however, it does not improve pain, disability or quality of life, when compared to usual care. Future studies could focus on developing strategies to increase the adherence rate for home-based exercise programs. Furthermore, a cost-effective analysis for long-term home-based interventions following TKA is warranted.

AVIS DE NON-RESPONSABILITÉ

Le contenu de cette page est fourni à titre d'information uniquement et n'est pas destiné à remplacer un avis médical, un diagnostic ou un traitement professionnel. Si vous avez besoin d'un traitement médical, demandez toujours l'avis de votre médecin ou rendez-vous au service des urgences le plus proche. Les opinions, croyances et points de vue exprimés par les individus sur le contenu de cette page ne reflètent pas les opinions, croyances et points de vue d'OrthoEvidence.

0 de 4 articles mensuels GRATUITS débloqués
Vous avez atteint votre limite de 4 vues d'articles gratuits ce mois-ci

Accédez à OrthoEvidence pour seulement 1,99 $ par semaine.

Restez informé des dernières données. Annulez à tout moment.
  • Évaluations critiques des derniers essais contrôlés randomisés à fort impact et des revues systématiques en orthopédie.
  • Accès au contenu des podcasts OrthoEvidence, y compris les collaborations avec le Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, les entretiens avec des chirurgiens de renommée internationale et les tables rondes sur l'actualité et les sujets orthopédiques.
  • Abonnement à The Pulse, une lettre d'information bihebdomadaire fondée sur des données probantes, conçue pour vous aider à prendre de meilleures décisions cliniques.
Upgrade
Close Dialog
Bienvenue à nouveau !
Vous avez oublié votre mot de passe ?
Commencez votre essai GRATUIT dès aujourd'hui !

Votre compte sera affilié à
et inclut un accès gratuit à OrthoEvidence.


OU
Vous avez oublié votre mot de passe ?

OU
Veuillez vérifier votre adresse électronique

Si un compte existe avec l'adresse e-mail fournie, un e-mail de réinitialisation du mot de passe vous sera envoyé. Si vous ne voyez pas d'e-mail, veuillez vérifier votre dossier de spam ou de courrier indésirable.

Pour plus d'assistance, contactez notre équipe d'assistance.

Veuillez vous connecter pour activer cette fonction

Pour accéder à cette fonctionnalité, vous devez être connecté à un compte OrthoEvidence actif. Veuillez vous connecter ou créer un compte d'essai GRATUIT.

Traduire le rapport ACE

OrthoEvidence utilise un service de traduction tiers pour rendre le contenu accessible dans plusieurs langues. Veuillez noter que même si tous les efforts sont faits pour assurer l'exactitude, les traductions ne sont pas toujours parfaites.

Comment citer ce document ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Comparing a 12-month home exercise program with usual care for post-TKA rehabilitation. OE Journal. 2014;2(7):18. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/comparing-a-12-month-home-exercise-program-with-usual-care-for-post-tka-rehabilitation

Copier la citation
Veuillez vous connecter pour activer cette fonction

Pour accéder à cette fonctionnalité, vous devez être connecté à un compte OrthoEvidence actif. Veuillez vous connecter ou créer un compte d'essai GRATUIT.

Fonctionnalité Membre Premium

Pour accéder à cette fonctionnalité, vous devez être connecté à un compte Premium OrthoEvidence.

Partager ACE Report