Comparative Effectiveness Of Tuina Therapy Versus Manual Physical Therapy For Knee Osteoarthritis .
Comparative effectiveness of Tuina therapy versus manual physical therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2025 Apr 8;25:128.One hundred forty patients with knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade II or III) were randomized to receive either Tuina therapy (n=70) or manual physical therapy (mPT) (n=70), each administered in eight 20-minute sessions over three weeks. The primary outcome was the change in total WOMAC score from baseline to week 4. Secondary outcomes included WOMAC subscales, knee pain measures (NRS), performance-based tests (Timed Up and Go, Chair Rise, One Leg Standing), QoL measures (SF-12, PGA), and adverse events. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, weeks 4, 8, and 16. Overall, the results of the study revealed no statistically significant difference in WOMAC scores between Tuina and mPT at week 4, but Tuina showed greater improvement at week 8. Tuina and mPT had similar safety profiles, and both were associated with clinically relevant improvements. These findings suggest that Tuina is comparably effective to mPT in the short-term management of knee osteoarthritis.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics