Cast Treatment Vs Surgery For Displaced Intra-Articular Type C Distal Radius Fractures .
Is cast treatment non-inferior to surgery for elderly patients with displaced intra-articular type c distal radius fractures? A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
One hundred thirty-eight patients with displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures with non-acceptable fracture characteristics were randomized to receive either cast treatment (n=70) or surgical treatment with open reduction and locking plate fixation (n=68). The primary outcome of interest was the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score at one-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, quality of life (measured by the EQ-5D), range of motion, grip strength, and complications. Outcomes were assessed up to 12 months. Overall, the results of the study revealed that the primary intention-to-treat analysis was inconclusive regarding the non-inferiority of cast treatment compared to surgery. However, a secondary analysis demonstrated non-inferiority after adjusting for baseline covariates. In conclusion, surgery may provide short-term benefits, particularly in physiologically young patients.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics