Bone Marrow Stimulation vs Decortication In Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair .
Bone Marrow Stimulation Yielded Similar Clinical Outcomes With Improved Tendon Healing and Abduction Strength Compared With Decortication for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Shoulder Active Patients.
Arthroscopy . 2025 Aug;41(8):2740-2749.e3.One hundred twenty patients with chronic unilateral rotator cuff tears were randomized to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) with bone marrow stimulation (BMS; n=60) or with decortication (DEC; n=60) as footprint preparation. The primary outcome was 24-month American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Secondary outcomes included VAS pain, Constant score, active ROM, abduction strength, and rotator cuff integrity by Sugaya grade on 24-month MRI. Outcomes were assessed up to 24 months. Overall, the results revealed no between-group difference in ASES at 24 months, but BMS yielded higher abduction strength and lower incomplete-healing rates. In short, while patient-reported shoulder function was similar, BMS improved structural healing and strength—benefits most evident in patients with higher preinjury shoulder activity.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics