Arthroscopic vs. Open Shoulder Stabilization with 15 Year Follow-up .
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
This study has been identified as potentially high impact.
OE's AI-driven High Impact metric estimates the influence a paper is likely to have by integrating signals from both the journal in which it is published and the scientific content of the article itself.
Developed using state-of-the-art natural language processing, the OE High Impact model more accurately predicts a study's future citation performance than journal impact factor alone.
This enables earlier recognition of clinically meaningful research and helps readers focus on articles most likely to shape future practice.
Arthroscopic Versus Open Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial With 15-Year Follow-up With an Assessment of the Glenoid Being "On-Track" and "Off-Track" as a Predictor of Failure.
Am J Sports Med . 2021 Jul;49(8):1999-2005.A series of 60 patients with recurrent anterior should instability were randomized to receive either arthroscopic (n=28) or open (n=32) stabilization and were available at 15 year follow-up. The primary outcome of interest was clinical failure defined as recurrent dislocation or subjective instability. Secondary outcomes of interest were the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the UCLA score and evaluation of the glenoid track. At 15 year follow-up, there was no difference in clinical failure between the groups. Similarly, there was no difference in the SANE, SST or UCLA scores at final follow-up. The presence of an off-track glenoid lesion was associated with higher rates of failure but was similar between groups.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
