FOOT & ANKLE
Immediate effects of anterior to posterior talocrural joint mobilizations following acute lateral ankle sprain
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2014;2(5):9 J Man Manip Ther. 2011 May;19(2):76-83. doi: 10.1179/2042618610Y.000000000517 patients were randomized to investigate the effects of a single bout of anterior to posterior (AP) talocrural joint mobilization for acute lateral ankle sprains. Patients received either a single 30-second bout of grade III AP talocrural joint mobilization or no intervention and were assessed after the first 24 hours. A single bout of AP talocrural joint mobilizations was revealed to have no immediate effect on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM), posterior talar translation, or self-reported function; however, an immediate effect on pain perception was observed.
Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?
Was allocation adequately concealed?
Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?
Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?
Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?
Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?
Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?
はい = 1
不確実＝0.5
無関係 = 0
いいえ = 0
報告基準評価では、著者が出版物内で試験の方法論的特徴や試験特性を報告する際の透明性を評価します。評価は以下の5つのカテゴリーに分類されます。
4/4
Randomization
3/4
Outcome Measurements
3/4
Inclusion / Exclusion
3/4
Therapy Description
3/4
Statistics
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
Fragility Indexは、重要な所見の解釈を助けるツールで、結果の強さの尺度を提供します。Fragility Indexは、その所見が有意でなくなるために、二項対立の結果に追加する必要がある連続した事象の数を表します。数値が小さいほど弱い所見を表し、数値が大きいほど強い所見を表します。
なぜ今この研究が必要なのですか？
Following a lateral ankle sprain, it has been reported that individuals may experience decreased dorsiflexion ROM and posterior talar glide. While these individuals may benefit from joint mobilization, there has been no previous study evaluating the use of anterior to posterior (AP) talocrural joint mobilizations in patients with acute lateral ankle sprains. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the immediate effects of a single bout of grade III AP talocrural joint mobilization on ankle dorsiflexion ROM, posterior talar translation, and self-reported pain and function in these patients.
主な研究課題は何ですか？
Did a single bout of AP talocrural joint mobilization lead to better ankle dorsiflexion ROM, posterior talar translation, and self-reported pain and function, compared to no intervention, in acute lateral ankle sprains when assessed after the first 24 hours?
重要な知見は？
- In regard to dorsiflexion ROM, there was not a significant group by time interaction (F2,30 = 0.17, P = 0.85, 1-beta = 0.07) or group main effect (F2, 30 = 0.21, P = 0.66, 1-beta = 0.07); however, there was a significant main effect for time (F2,30 = 3.67, P = 0.04, 1-beta = 0.63).
- While there was a significant improvement in dorsiflexion ROM from baseline to 24 hour follow-up (P=0•037), there was no significant difference between the treatment (6.49 (SD 6.43) to 8.82 (SD 7.29)) and control (7.36 (SD 6.38) to 9.94 (SD 4.02)) groups (P > 0.05).
- There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) regarding posterior talar translation measures between the treatment (7.09 (SD 3.54) to 7.06 (SD 2.99)) and control (5.86 (SD 2.81) to 6.95 (SD 3.64)) groups from baseline to the 24 hour follow-up. No significant group by time interaction (F2,30= 0.58, P = 0.57, 1-beta = 0.14), group main effect (F2,30 = 0.45, P = 0.51, 1-beta = 0.10), or time main effect (F2,30 = 0.86, P = 0.43, 1-beta = 0.18) were seen.
- In respect to the FADI-ADL and FADI-sport, there were no significant group by time interactions (F1,15 = 0.43, P = 0.52, 1-beta = 0.09; F1,15 = 0.04, P = 0.84, 1-beta = 0.05, respectively) or group main effects (F1,15 = 1.51, P = 0.24, 1-beta = 0.21; F1,15 = 0.00, P = 0.99, 1-beta = 0.05).
- The treatment group demonstrated a 20% reduction in pain (t8 = -3.74, P = 0.006) at the 24 hour follow-up when compared to the control group (t7 = 0.00, P = 1.0).
最も覚えておくべきことは？
A single bout of AP talocrural joint mobilization for acute ankle sprains displayed no effect in increasing ankle dorsiflexion ROM, decreasing posterior talar glide, or improving self-reported function. However, individuals receiving joint mobilization demonstrated decreased pain compared to those who did not receive the intervention.
それが私の患者ケアにどのように影響するか？
This study suggests that joint mobilization provides no apparent benefit in ankle dorsiflexion ROM, posterior talar translation, or self-reported function when treating acute lateral ankle sprains. However, there may be a positive benefit in terms of pain perception immediately following treatment. Future research is required to investigate the long-term effects of multiple applications of joint mobilizations.
免責事項
このページに記載されている内容は、情報提供のみを目的としたものであり、専門的な医療アドバイス、診断、治療の代わりとなるものではありません。治療が必要な場合は、必ず医師の診断を仰ぐか、最寄りの救急外来を受診してください。このページに記載されている内容に関して個人が表明した意見、信念、見解は、OrthoEvidenceの意見、信念、見解を反映するものではありません。
0の4 月間無料記事のロック解除
